Lion.Kanzen

Ok must be look like this. obviusly if they even have lowercase fonts, and other typography elements, like dots, etc they don't have concept as justify and center text, etc. those becomes with the Gutenberg ideas and beyond.

What? Or which exactly? I don't get what you mean... yes there is the actual roadmap, and the devs work daily committing changes.

I like the idea about units building in battlefield siege weapons, reminds me Praetorians.

http://trac.wildfiregames.com/wiki/GettingStartedProgrammers in 0AD You can contribuye with main code, I mean The game as volunteer, open ticket, submitting patches. Givin feedback, suggestions.

have a mode defense tower ( castle) and will be like AoK, but the question is , will be less orthopedic ? I mean polish gameplay and micromanagement

In my iPad don't let me but in my computer I can,mother problem start when I try to copy something, my iPad copy entire page, so I try delete, when I solved that little issue, and starting to give a reply out the box of quote, don't let me send my reply and says is required, so... What is missing, the warning need be more specific, yes I se something is required, but what is that thing, all look fine, and why my safari browser don't let me and my computer Firefox let me reply, as you see in the picture all looks fine.

it was happen again but this time let me reply(Im in a computer)

I like that mechanic because in AOM you determine you play still 3 times between 6 gods, each with advantages for a type of developemnt of your faction, you can specialize your army, but you need wise to choice having in count the election is adequate to defeat your enemies. Because a bad decision have the consequences, the bad decision have consequences.

I solved but don't let me edit my reply, because when try to save changes, say "required " i link the post where have this problem. the problem was presented in quote like this, I'm not sure if was because I modify true quote, and the problem appears only in my iPad. I solved in my PC browser. there is the link

yes another option, but this work in random map mode.

or reassigned. you know start with twice CC and the other things.

probably good for campaign TBS mode. but I like the cultural meaning, may be trough Tech and hard to take or easy retake tech. this mean a Technology to make recapturing most easy. because nationalist pride or invaders aversion/ hostility against foreign rule.

two ways, here in the forums in bugs subforum or in the trac (Development tab)

I like take towers and barracks too. but can be a system common in city warfare or siege defenses , can destroy your all building hurting the enemy, yes a trap. burning the enemies. In rise of nations you can order to destroy a building when start lose loyality, but the process take time. So is a run against the takers before they perform at 100% the capture.

yes I asked this before the alpha release.

Is like a workout in a gym, if you don't train you lose the muscles ( the experience in this way and body capacity to get in action ) but... If you go back you never forget some routines and the muscles can recovery the strength. xp for me involves : skill, experience movement combat, accuracy , body strength to combat, resistance ( like when you running every day you get more resistance ) can be nice have a penalty for garrisoned units and very idle units but may be its too complicated. may be can be 3 to 0 ( veteran soldier) and 0 to -3 ( more village skills)

I can't edit a post... says " required"

Ok , now i can give some extended reply

I'm thinking the last of my test about that... what at about upgrade the Xp military, like when a you have big time to do make work out, you are slower but keeping the work all days you back in shape to work the body, the same happen with these work. The gathering, the woodcutting, mining etc. the soldier get back to be a civilian but if is called to battle generates Xp level is more easy. these are my thoughts...

Yes I agree , don't be default action. Is annoying.

We need improve the formations.

Can you explain more about this?

More explicit? Can you explain a little more.