Leaderboard

https://code.wildfiregames.com/D5132

Some modders have way bigger fish to fry with new alphas, lol. Btw, you might want to bookmark PortA26ToA27 – Wildfire Games if you're going to keep modding.

It's telling you this file doesn't exist. Check for typos and compare it with javelinist actor for example.

I don't really understand the rationale behind this. If a sole fort has no root attached to it, why should it affect the loyalty of a building that does have a root?

A24 was the only release with that feature and was just reverted right back. There are more, grep for Root in simulation templates.

I see in the description of the Maurya hero building, the Harmya, it says "Territory Root." I agree with @chrstgtr, this seems like a random addition to the civ. I'm curious why it only applies to Maurya and Persia. If there is a historical justification, I'd understand I guess. I did a quick test and it looks like the Persian hero building, the Apadana, also has this feature of maintaining root without a CC, but there is no mention of it in the building's description. Maybe one of the developers/ BAs can add it in if this feature is to continue? Thanks for answering my question.

Forts used to have territory root but that was taken out in a24–>a25 because it encouraged too much turtling. (I think fort only gave root in a24.) Maurya hero building gives territory root. (Maybe Persian hero buildings does too.) I don’t like that feature. Taking out territory root against Maurya is effectively “kill CC and find the hero building.” The Maurya building isn’t a last stand location. It’s easily captured as soon as it’s found but that might not be easy to do. It looks like your connection to your ally was just a little too short

I strongly support a further reduction in cc cost. a couple of possible nerfs that could go along with the reduction in cost/build time: - no housing bonus: the baseline 20 pop is hardcorded instead - max arrows reduced (currently is 23, could be half that number and that wouldn't make a difference in early game, as for late game, I say it would be a balance improvement actually)

The battle of the Kushites with the Chinese is also scientifically ridiculous. And yet... I believe that the ability for all nations to have a basic set of units, as in the Age of Empires 2, is not useless, but on the contrary, with certain allied bonuses, it can change the tactics of playing for a nation. I am not asking to give elephants to all nations, but to give them the combat units that obviously existed among them.

Ox carts Similar to Gauls Some may have nomadic buildings.(semi-nomadic). Very good for raiding and looting. New weapons like battle axes. Women could have bonuses to encourage men to fight.