Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 2015-08-08 in all areas

  1. Semita huh? looks promising
    1 point
  2. Here are my ideas: 0 A.D. 19 ... Semita - Latin for "path" because of the new pathfinder Ignis Semita - "fire path" Ignis Tempus - "time of fire" Ferro Igne - "iron and fire" Trahentium - "trail" Sanguinem Semita - "blood path" Polypodis - "octopus"
    1 point
  3. I can't help but question the logic of that sentence Usually having strange humour means you find things funny that others don't. And if they don't they might rather be insulted. So, especially in an indirect way of communication like in text chat, it's usually best to hold back and think about how others might interpret what you write. A suggestion might be to try and understand others rather than to be sorry that others don't understand you. If nothing else it's usually easier to make sure others understand what you mean if you understand a bit about how they think and see things.
    1 point
  4. Just to start there was a large effort originally to show that memory was a significant issue. This can be seen in the original posts connected with this work and all the profiling posted in that thread. Whilst I do not think that the memory improvement would solve the performance problems related to algorithmic issues I do think it will be more than just a fractional improvement. However, to verify this my plan is to target specific areas that are critical to performance first like the unit ranging code or the pathfinder. I agree that just changing the entire codebase to use a memory pooling system without first verifying that it is helpful would be stupid a lot of work for little benefit. Thanks for the link to paper.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...