BreakfastBurrito_007 Posted May 16, 2021 Report Share Posted May 16, 2021 17 hours ago, Dizaka said: I think nerfing archers should be cautionary. I really don't want them to end up like in a23. I think, at present, it may be best to use archers as a baseline and bring other units in line with them. I think this is a good way to go about balancing the ranged units. Perhaps an exception being at least some reduction in archer speed, and an increase in javelineer speed. I don't know if the damage values for those ranged units should be the same too, since I have almost never seen battles between slingers and javelins in 4v4s. I think it is right not to bring all the ranged units down by getting into a tit for tat nerf race between ranged units. I am usually seeing give or take half ranged/half melee which I think is a pretty good ranged/melee balance, which is certainly one bonus of a24. I think if we get ranged infantry right on a25, rotation adjusted, and the turtling problem is solved, then a25 will be a vast improvement over a24 and a23. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BreakfastBurrito_007 Posted May 16, 2021 Report Share Posted May 16, 2021 On 15/05/2021 at 1:36 AM, Yekaterina said: Another solution: citizen soldiers offer very weak attack, champions offer huge attack. Meanwhile make champions cheaper, so the army would be half champions and half citizen soldiers. This would be nice, so a greater proportion of champion cost comes in the form of opportunity cost in exchange for better army composition. Problems: low champion diversity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.