Dont people file it extreamly op that they can win the game WITH ONLY MAKING FARMS AND gathering wood?

[cool]

Developers! DONT REMOVE THIS OP, I think instead they can make the ai have many attractive perks like roads, pre built structures, etc, it will just reuire a creative brainstorm in order to get the things set up. But WINNING THE GAME WITH ONLY FARMS AND GATHERING WOOD IS SOMETHING I FOUND REALLY OP in civilizations where the soldiers cost only food and wood and THAT IS GOOD(not in real life though)

I just want to know if anyone else know this

[Gurken Khan]

While one could win spamming only f&w units, there wouldn't be access to p3, certain buildings and a lot of tecs, the forge upgrades for example. With a slower eco (very limited gathering tecs) and a weaker army (because of few/no forge upgrades) it could only be successful to a certain difficulty level.

[Grautvornix]

Well just building farms and only gathering wood is a possible strategy.  However, it is not guaranteed at all that you would have sufficient wood resources to gather. Depends a lot on the map and on your opponents. A bit of trading might be needed. And a minimum of defence as well. Ah, and what about additional techs? Oops, now you are in the game...

[Lion.Kanzen]

There are more conditions missing from your premise.

I guess you're talking about avoiding collecting stone and metal.

But with trade you can avoid some of that.

The game is designed for that moment in the late game. When those 2 resources run out.