Abadu Posted April 15, 2007 Report Share Posted April 15, 2007 (edited) Some ideas for this possible faction:-Level one-Avars-Heavy cavalryLink-AxemanLink-Horse archerLink-Noble cavalry-(At right)Link-Medium cavalry-(Fight with axe)Link-Level two-Magyars-Light cavalryLink-Vezéri válogatott vitéz(Bodyguard)Link-Bő lovasíjász(Noble horse archer)Link-Gyalogos testőrség(Spearman)Link-SwordsmanLink-ArcherLink-Level three-Early Hungary-Szekely cavalryLink-Jobbagy spearmanLink-Transylvanian macemanLink-KnightLink-Croatian light cavalryLink-Jobbagy archerLink-Level four-Late Hungary-Bosnian light cavalry(Fight with spear)Link-HandgunnerLink-Transylvanian infantryLink-ClipeatiLink-Feudal cavalry-(Fight with sword)Link-SzekelyLinkLink-CrossbowmanLink-Tabor(War Wagon) LinkIs the civ ok?EDIT:First try on the new design,it will be improved with the timeAge I:From 1066 (Battle of Hastings) to 1171 (Saladin becomes the first Ayyubid Sultan)-Peasant levy:Peasants armed with bows;weak unit-Jobbagy archers:Freeman,semi-professional warriors living in the castle lands;decent unit-Jobbagy sperman:Freeman,semi-professional warriors living in the castle lands;decent unit-Servientes regis:"Royal" cavalry armed with bow and lance in the magyar style;Good unit-Knight:Just knights;good unitAge II:From 1171 to 1291 (The fall of Acre)-Peasant levy:Peasants armed with bows;Weak unit-Jobbagy archers:Freeman,semi-professional warriors living in the castle lands;Decent unit-Jobbagy sperman:Freeman,semi-professional warriors living in the castle lands;Decent unit-Crossbowman:Normal crossbowman;Decent unit-Servientes regis:"Royal" cavalry armed with bow and lance in the magyar style;Good unit-Knight:Just knights;Good unitAge III:From 1291 to 1389 (Battle of Kosovo)-Peasant levy:Peasants armed with bows;Weak unit-Jobbagy archers:Freeman,semi-professional warriors living in the castle lands;Decent unit-Jobbagy sperman:Freeman,semi-professional warriors living in the castle lands;Decent unit-Crossbowman:Normal crossbowman;Decent unit-Knight:Just knights;Good unit-"Militias portallis":Militia horse archers;Weak unitAge IV:From 1389 to 1492 (Fall of Granada)-Peasant levy:Peasants armed with bows;Weak unit-Jobbagy archers:Freeman,semi-professional warriors living in the castle lands;Decent unit-Jobbagy sperman:Freeman,semi-professional warriors living in the castle lands;Decent unit-Crossbowman:Normal crossbowman;Decent unit-Handgunner:Normal handgunner;Good unit-Armati:Pavisse bearers;Good strategic unit-Clipeati:Soldiers with polearms who fought alongside the armati;Good unit-Knight:Just knights;good unit-"Militias portallis":Militia horse archers;Regular unit-Hussar:Fast light cavalry armed with square shields,lances and bows;Good unit-Mounted Crossbowman:Medium cavalry armed with crossbows;Decent unitIs it good?(A lot of foreign auxilliaries and mercenaries are missing,but those are the essential units) Edited January 6, 2009 by Abadu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belisarivs Posted April 15, 2007 Report Share Posted April 15, 2007 (edited) I think, that first period should be Avar instead.http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/2425/avar1nk2.jpgThose Osprey books are your scans? Edited April 15, 2007 by Belisarivs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abadu Posted April 15, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2007 First of all,thank you very much for all the scanned pictures,they wil be usefullAbout the first period:The better would be this,but I tough that,If we make an vlach state(Wallachia or/and Moldavia),they would have to use also the avars,and since the huns were in Hungary few time before the year 500(and they are unique and "easy" to find information about),I tough in use them for Hungary and keep the avars for a vlach state.I know that I used the Carolingians for many civs,but they are easy to find info and pictures about them the avars,that makes me able to "divide" they units for some civsOf course,If you think it will be too bad to use the Huns,I can change the first period.What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belisarivs Posted April 15, 2007 Report Share Posted April 15, 2007 (edited) Problem with Huns is, that their empire disintegrated soon after Atillas death. And that was even before fall of West and thus out of scope of mod.If you don't like Avars, what about Gepids, Heruli or Rugians? Or confederation of these?I think, that it would be still better to prefer accuracy before uniqueness. Avars simply lived in large area.I think, that Hungarians and Vlachs could simply have same units in first period but still be separated nations. Edited April 15, 2007 by Belisarivs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abadu Posted April 15, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2007 Ok,I will change themBut besides this,I think that ,If not against history,that uniqueness is an opition that we should choose(As in the case of the italian factions) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belisarivs Posted April 16, 2007 Report Share Posted April 16, 2007 Yes. If not against history. I think, that While Italian factions cold be done the way they were, Hungarians aren't the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MythicRuler Posted June 27, 2008 Report Share Posted June 27, 2008 Hungarians today call themselves Magyars just so you all know and they call Hungary Magyaroszag (missing accents and stuff) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belisarivs Posted June 28, 2008 Report Share Posted June 28, 2008 I know. For working purposes we use english names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MythicRuler Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Just making sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apomonomenos Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 It sounds good and all, but 0 AD is for civilizations ranging from 500BC-500AD, and the Hungarians weren't much of a power until around the 9th Century (If I can remember History Correctly) and wouldn't fit in. I'm just saying that it's a good idea, because I think it's a great idea, but it just doesn't fit in historically. I may be wrong if someone can correct me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 Alex, this is a mod. It's not 0AD, it does not share it's settting.It is a medieval modification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apomonomenos Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 Alex, this is a mod. It's not 0AD, it does not share it's settting.It is a medieval modification.I'm too lazy to read the titles.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts