hyperion

There are multiple drivers for amd gpus, this might be a mismatch of components. Suggest to use mesas amdgpu driver with radv. Check your distros documentation, especially keep an eye on selecting icd.

@Itms, congrats on rc1! Packaged for my distro and all went well, the only thing that might need a note is if using system premake5 then it needs to be < beta4 because of the api break.

They are aware: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2345520

The package manager knows which files belong to a package, there surely is a command to list them, check what wx-config-* wxwidgets-gtk3 installed.

it means wx-config-gtk3 no longer exists on your system or is no longer in PATH. You can use an absolute path for WX_CONFIG, but it must point to the wx-config corresponding to your desired wx install.

Lobby games are also just lan games in essence, the only difference is that the needed address gets passed to others via a neat ui. The lobby also adds some mechanisms to allow some additional network setups to work, like firewall puching / stun. As a bonus you get a chat and a ranking bot. I'm pretty sure you don't want to setup your own lobby but you could, the code and instructions is at https://github.com/0ad/lobby-infrastructure If you create a lan game it means 0ad on your computer will listen on the specified port for connections. Everyone around the globe that can connect to you computer will be able to join that game. How to make your computer reachable from the internet typically means adding portforwarding to your router and configuring the firewall. But even then, due to IP4 starvation your ISP might make it virtually impossible to get it working.

Fixed in https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/commit/263b481442ccf51f8588828c8bce7a2843299864

a23 was much better than a24 in my opinion, that so called "reset" was silly in my book, just that you implied @borg- is a bad player with no clue of gameplay and that there was no real reason given which I consider a lie. I'm not at all against reverting the patch. Feel free to create a PR, whining won't change anything.

@borg- clearly stated he approves the patch, and there are reasons given even if you disapprove. Also that was at a time when balancing was mostly discussed in PMs, which is luckily no longer the case.

Indeed, missed that reference in the wiki. Hope that was the last one.

There were no relevant work since the last time it was brought up AFAIR, even if it was quite a while back since.

No useful per se, but if it makes life easier for the maintainer than it's fine. Basically you could say we cover around 800 to 1100 elo now where I'd say we should cover 400 to 1200, in 200 elo steps maybe, with a fun to play AI.

About ministers, the bonus was intended to be much more, then there was an argument made that this needs to be useless for the sake of balance. Trying the initial intended value is still something I think is worth a shot. Another point is just because top players don't use certain techs doesn't mean low elo players can't see value in it, so the statistics probably paint a skewed picture.

I have to say the AI needs to be fun to play against for the regular user, a super powerful AI isn't necessarily needed. One major issue often brought up is the lowest difficulty level is to challenging for new users. The AI also struggles on water maps. Having a powerful second AI with the purpose of challenging to top players is an option tho. Edit: added "top" to players, as I meant from the start

Don't use a chat window at all. The chat functionality is a poor match. If you want to scroll back just read a manual instead of an interactive intro. Just pop up a window / banner for each objective as you do in other cases already. Suggest to allow skipping objectives.