Justinian Posted June 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 I like the Dacians, Huns and the Parthians, but I still say it would be easier (and more realistic) to give both the Germanics and the Romans different options for levelling up.The Germanics would have a different choice at every turn:SarmatiansFrisiansSaxonsAnglesNordicsetc. etc.wheras the Romans only need:Pax RomanaEastern RomansWestern RomansBut that is the last I will (for your sake) say on the matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fionn Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 (edited) This looks so much more like a list for a Bronze Age mod. Part 2 is based from AD1 to AD500. Also, try narrowing your field here as so far 0AD comprises of mostly European Races/Tribes.0AD pt.II is the Romanized version and they've heavily hinted (if not declared) that there will be TWO Roman FactionsA better list would be:Western RomaniiEastern RhomiaonGoths (if its Ostro or Visi, who cares)Saxons (Sachsens)Frisians?Berber Tribes?And other notable "barbarorum"Oops, almost forgot the Angles.I like it, but why waste time with all the Germanic groups? They are probably going to make the Germans a civilisation anyway. Also, I think Carthage may have been a Berber state. I mean look at the location. Just my opinion however. Edited June 29, 2008 by Fionn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fionn Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 (edited) Take this with a grain of salt, because I am a developer, but (!!!!) if I had my way (!!!) the faction list would look like this... Imperial Romans - "Western" Romans during the 1st and 2nd centuries. These are the Pax Pomana Romans, from Augustus to Marcus Aurelius. Eastern Romans - "Late" and "Early Byzantines"-style Romans of the late empire. Lots of chain mail. Round shields. Long swords. Medieval looking. Dacians - A Thracian-style faction with Germanic and Sarmatian infuences. Had 3 important wars against Roman, finally succumbing to the Romans under Trajan. Huns - Nomadic, buildings are either mobile (like the Norse "resource cart" from AOM) or can pack up and move (like the "trebuchet" from Age of Kings). They also gain a lot from looting. Highly mobile and cavalry-based. Parthians - Part 2's desert faction. Cavalry based. Lots of raiding. Lots of archery. Germanics - They'll have many sub-factions to choose from. Ostrogoths, Visigoths, etc.Hm I like this. I'm not too crazy on having another Iranian faction though. Also, I can't make my mind up on Byzantium. I do not know much about the Dacians but from what I have read they sound good enough to put in the game. At least we can agree on the Germans (infantry?) and the Huns. Edited June 29, 2008 by Fionn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBlack103 Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 I like the idea of all the germanics being sub-factions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fionn Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 (edited) I like the idea of all the germanics being sub-factions The Germans played a key role during the second half of Rome's existence. All those raiders would be rolling in their graves if they heard you! Edited June 29, 2008 by Fionn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos_Ruler Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 Maybe you don't know how we are using "sub-factions" in this game. Imagine the game "Age of Mythology." You know how you get a choice of a "minor god" when you advance an age? Well, in 0 A.D., when you play a cartain faction and advance to the last city phase you get a choice between sub-factions. Each sub-faction has different heroes, super units, ans special technologies. So, for instance, the Celts: You have the standard Celtic units available until the City Phase, where you are then allowed to choose between Brtions or Gauls sub-factions (each with different Super Units, Heroes, and Special Techs). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinian Posted June 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 So it is in essence like choosing the different leaders in AoE3? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBlack103 Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 Maybe you don't know how we are using "sub-factions" in this game. Imagine the game "Age of Mythology." You know how you get a choice of a "minor god" when you advance an age? Well, in 0 A.D., when you play a cartain faction and advance to the last city phase you get a choice between sub-factions. Each sub-faction has different heroes, super units, ans special technologies. So, for instance, the Celts: You have the standard Celtic units available until the City Phase, where you are then allowed to choose between Brtions or Gauls sub-factions (each with different Super Units, Heroes, and Special Techs).Are you talking to me or Fionn here? Either way, I understood this concept. Just like the Gauls and Hellenes in Pt I, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos_Ruler Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 Speaking to Fionn (and everyone else who didn't know the concept). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fionn Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 Speaking to Fionn (and everyone else who didn't know the concept).Yeah I understand the concept. But who would the Germans be a sub-faction of? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos_Ruler Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 Germans would be the faction - Visigoths, Ostrogoths, and perhaps 1 or 2 more tribes would be the sub-Factions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fionn Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 Germans would be the faction - Visigoths, Ostrogoths, and perhaps 1 or 2 more tribes would be the sub-Factions.Yeah I thought that's what you meant. There are so many German tribes that it can make one's head spin! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formlesstree4 Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 I would like to see that list of German tribes, and point and be like "OMG There are so many!!!!"Then fall over and pass out*shifts eyes*Don't stare at me!! >.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBlack103 Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 Then fall over and pass outEspecially if you often play as Romans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formlesstree4 Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 haha, nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrEmjeR Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 romans are still most important but there are more germans in the game lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsig Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Parthian sub factions could be different family dynasties, like the Surens, Mihrans, and Karens, to reflect the feudal nature of the empire. Each could have special units and bonuses based off of the region they historically held power in. Surens = Saka light cavalry, Kushan Infantry, Gondophares as a hero.Mihrans = Strong Daylamite infantry, Bahram Chobin as a heroKarens = defensive bonuses, Hunnic and Median unitsSassanids (might as well throw them in as a possiblity) = Strong priests and heavy cavalry, Kartir and Khosrow as heroes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOXAS1 Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 I have an idea Crumbling walls that actually leave debris and you guy can go through the breach Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usac Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 I'm still probably the only person who wants the Palmyrans in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos_Ruler Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 Palmyrans would essentially be exactly like the Eastern Romans, which we are already including in Part 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBlack103 Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Personally, I look forward to testudos mowing over unorganized rebel celts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos_Ruler Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 lol, as do we all? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fionn Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 (edited) You know how I mentioned Scythians before? Well I never really thought into the Sarmatians as Scythians. Hahaha looks like I will get my way anyway (if Scipii_Alemanus has his way)! : PSorry if this is off topic, but can you choose your/the computer's subfaction before the match begins? Thanks. Edited July 25, 2008 by Fionn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undo Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 (edited) Would the Germanic subfactions include all the main barbaric forces? By "main barbaric forces", I mean- Sueves- Franks- Angles- Saxons- Burgundians- Visigoths- OstrogothsAbout the Huns, I seem to remember having read somewhere that there is confusion between East European Huns and Asian Huns, being the latter nomadic and the former not. Even if EEHuns were nomadic, they eventually settled somewhere in Hungary, so mountable and dismountable buildings are probably a better option (rather than mobile buildings).Or, alternatively, they could have mobile buildings that could be dismounted somewhere whenever the player wished, but once dismounted could no longer be mounted. Edited July 25, 2008 by Undo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fionn Posted July 25, 2008 Report Share Posted July 25, 2008 You know it's too bad the Cherusci Germans (not Germanics) were not as important as the other Germanic tribes. Then we can have the Battle of Teutoburg Forest with Arminius as the Cherusci hero. But oh well... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.