Jump to content

sphyrth

Community Members
  • Posts

    949
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by sphyrth

  1. Ships being unable to ram, unable to know if you're being attacked, missing Factions.
    These aren't balance issues. They're more gameplay-related issues.

    Anyway, people here can differentiate between the Complaints that Deserve Sympathy and the Complaints that are Plain Trolling. Posts that assume the latter just insults the admins' intelligence and are easy to dismiss.

    Instead of just complaining, why not join the posts where people are actually trying to solve them? You know... Battle Sounds, Game Balance, etc. are being talked about just before you posted here...

    which makes me think that you just cobbled together a rushed set of complaints based on the Forum Topics.

    • Thanks 1
  2. 16 hours ago, badosu said:

    I am afraid these towers will be abused much. As much as I like the idea of leaving my base knowing that I can defend from siege, I am concerned about incentivising turtling.

    You have the player experience, so I can take that into account.

    But I think the Towers serve more of as Offensive Siege buildings. It's the Tower for the Offensive Base Crawlers. And besides, I don't think you can't get them by turtling anyway (since they're City-Phase buildings).

  3. The OP's rant is valid. I happen to support another snail-speed development game, but I have given up hope ever receiving it since I've become too old for it. I can't say the same for 0 A.D, but sniec's statements are a very friendly slap.

    I felt the stung when he felt sorry for the devs and fans because it might still be an Alpha after three more generations.

    TLDR
    He doesn't like the game, but he wants it to succeed (get past Alpha) soon... which won't seem to happen.

    • Sad 1
  4. Nah, it's more like Tweaking / Updating it. The images on the OP no longer represent what we have today... especially the Celts (I don't know if they're the Gauls or the Britons because they used the same set of assets back then).

    Anyway, I no longer have anything to say with the general layout of the body. It's good. (If I were to make an arbitrary complaint, it's TOO good... it looks more like a travel brochure than a flyer for a game).

    Now, I think that the Twitter and Facebook links (I would like to add the Youtube one as well) should be placed close together as a column instead of trying to balance the whole thing out.

    Here's my awful attempt at trying to accomplish that:

    Suggestion.thumb.jpg.51818a2258bb35de06a95430ed0bcb5d.jpg

    On the lowercase vs. uppercase, I fall into the lowercase camp. I don't want to be overwhelmed with too much "screaming" text. But then again, what I see as a softcopy sometimes doesn't have the same effect when I see it as printed.

  5. I kinda miss the "History is Yours for the Taking" part... even if you argue that it'd be cheesy nowadays.

    The new Britons' image looks depressing compared to the old Celtic one, which is more lively looking.

    I find the Ptolemies Image as the most captivating part. I can almost feel the realism... as if it's a snapshot from a movie or something.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...