Spear + Pike Classes Combined?

[sphyrth]

Okay, so it's established that multiple Unit Classes have benefits from the side of the developer and/or modder. But I think that the Foot Companions and Egyptian Pikemen should not have the Spear class in addition to Pike class.

But what do you guys think?

[wowgetoffyourcellphone]

It's mainly for techs and attack bonus that they have both. But it would be relatively simple to adjust 

[Nescio]

You're right, Pikemen shouldn't have the Spearman class. I've included it in D1815 months ago.

[sphyrth]

17 hours ago, Nescio said:

You're right, Pikemen shouldn't have the Spearman class. I've included it in D1815 months ago.

That's a nice patch. I'm kind of on the Fence about the lengthened words, though.
I'm torn between Saving Space (Spear) and Clarity (Spearman).

[Nescio]

6 hours ago, sphyrth said:

That's a nice patch. I'm kind of on the Fence about the lengthened words, though.
I'm torn between Saving Space (Spear) and Clarity (Spearman).

What matters to me most is consistency; we already have Archer and Maceman, not Bow and Mace. Moreover, I believe having matching file names, generic names, and classes (e.g. `template_unit_cavalry_melee_swordsman` has Unit, Cavalry, Melee, and Swordsman classes and “Cavalry Swordsman” generic name) reduces the likelihood of minor mistakes.