Celtictool Posted April 29, 2013 Report Share Posted April 29, 2013 Is there a current Wiki for 0 A.D.? After Googling for a bit, I found this Wikia which does contain a fair amount of information, but comes off as cluttered to me. Is there a 0 A.D. wiki which is not as cluttered? When I think of game Wikis, I think of something like the EUIII Wiki which is quite clean and uses a MediaWiki template. The template is the same as that used by Wikipedia so navigation comes off as familiar to a user. That being said, it seems like using a MediaWiki template is restricted to people that have their own server and related kit. I am not suggesting that the development team go out and purchase this kit just to make me happy. However, I have thought of organizing some of what I am seeing around the forum into a Google Sites Wiki (see Project Wiki) for my personal use so I can make connections between projects, mods and threads. Are there any rules/laws against me doing that? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yves Posted April 29, 2013 Report Share Posted April 29, 2013 We have our own official 0 A.D. wiki here: http://trac.wildfiregames.com/It contains a lot of information but parts of it are outdated. Of course you can create your own wiki but it would probably be better if you helped improving our current wiki. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celtictool Posted April 29, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2013 We have our own official 0 A.D. wiki here: http://trac.wildfiregames.com/It contains a lot of information but parts of it are outdated. Of course you can create your own wiki but it would probably be better if you helped improving our current wiki. Hi Yves,Thanks for the response. I did not find that site by Googling. The main thing that I was noticing, by poking around in the art concept and mod sections, was there seems to be quite a bit of overlap in units requested in some cases. Maybe just some sort of inventory would be better than my Google Sites idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idanwin Posted April 29, 2013 Report Share Posted April 29, 2013 (edited) That site could really do with a bit of user input xD It mostly dates from the time there were only two civilisations! (the gameplay part that is) Edited April 29, 2013 by idanwin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion.Kanzen Posted April 30, 2013 Report Share Posted April 30, 2013 I think have more platform media it's nice from different users, that he say, can be a fan site not official. And this way the game can be more popular. In my opinion I say yes why opposite to have a more alternative. And is more visual,easy, the trac is more for professional developers than fans and non experts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.