Unit comparison table

[DesertRose]

Did some little comparison table (.ods / LibreOffice) for units. Not finished yet (a few units are missing, and in the Civ Column is incomplete).

Some data points I found interesting:

• Naked Fanatics have, despite the big complain thread about them, not overly impressive combat stats
• The P2 Champion Infantry Swordsmen of Athenians and Carthaginians have insane stats cost-for-cost, and have the additional bonus to be fast
• Maidan Guard have really bad stats if you compare them to other fast infantry; they can only keep up thanks to the 20% damage bonus from Steel Working
• Elephant Archers are cost-for-cost about twice as tanky as other archers and still deal about the same damage

 

0AD_Unit_Calculations_028_01.ods

[real_tabasco_sauce]

44 minutes ago, DesertRose said:

Naked Fanatics have, despite the big complain thread about them, not overly impressive combat stats

unit speed is extremely strong in this game.

[guerringuerrin]

4 minutes ago, real_tabasco_sauce said:

unit speed is extremely strong in this game.

i was just about to say that

what is the cost multiplier, @DesertRose?

[DesertRose]

That was phrased poorly. What I meant is that they have roughly the same combat stats as regular infantry, despite being much faster.

 

Cost Multiplier = Gather Rate

How much do you value each resource. The smaller the number the higher you value it.