wowgetoffyourcellphone Posted Monday at 14:31 Report Share Posted Monday at 14:31 9 hours ago, Classic-Burger said: But Han was not the only dynasty, nor were the Maurya the only Indian kingdom. That's true, but we already don't call them just "Indians" or "Chinese." We differentiate them already. Yes, later we could add the Guptas and Tang. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genava55 Posted Monday at 15:33 Report Share Posted Monday at 15:33 1 hour ago, wowgetoffyourcellphone said: Yes, later we could add the Guptas and Tang. Warring states China would be nice too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic-Burger Posted Tuesday at 06:47 Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:47 16 hours ago, wowgetoffyourcellphone said: That's true, but we already don't call them just "Indians" or "Chinese." We differentiate them already. Yes, later we could add the Guptas and Tang. Before the Mauryas there was something. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_Empire Preceded by Succeeded by: Nanda Empire Arachosia Paropamisadae Parada kingdom Aparanta Saurashtra (region) Andhras Kalinga (historical region) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanda_Empire I would take this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.