Jump to content

Quacker

WFG Retired
  • Posts

    1.898
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Quacker

  1. Thanks DA, gj. Now to test it on myself (or you B)).

    Maybe we make it so, that people only get 1 per reply, 3 per new topic and the bonus isn't that good either, but once they make an outstanding post, they get a whopping amount by a moderator.

    Sounds like a slice from my head (i.e., i've hoped for that change).

  2. Exactly why i think we need a system where you only gain currency if you have so many words in a post. Also, if a moderator/admin deems a post a "spamoney" post, he can fine that person.

    I think right next to the "Donate" link should be a "Fine" link, leading to a form of how much to fine and a box to place the reason in. Of course, this form would only be visible by authoritative people.

  3. (side note: yes, we could have had this discussion in MSN, but its better for all too see it and give feed back)

    Alright about the #-word idea...anyone else?

    The problems with percents, no one offense is really worth 100%. Thus, its impossible to get to 0%. I.E., if you have 100 0ads, lose 50%, then another 50%, you don't lose 100%, you're losing 75% (50%, then 50% of that is 25%, 25% + 50% is 75%).

    I have the right formula for under 1,000 coins. Instead of having it times 5, multiply times 1/2, and instead of 1 per 1,000 coins, make it 1 per 100. Thus, 2 (50 rounded up is 100) x 100 (for the offense) x 1/2 = 100. That means you lose all yer coins until you get a substantial amount. That way, its the more mature members that get up to 1,000 posts, and they have more of a chance of surviving.

    Of course, we can always fine by even more than the formula grants if its deemed such a serious offense. Of course the formula needs fine tuning, if its chosen to be used.

  4. Well, 20 words is just a starting figure, its tenative. It could only be applicable for the "General Forums", not forums such as "Computer Desk" where such conversations would take place...i dunno, it's an idea that needs finessing.

    As for people with mass coinage, we could multiply the offense's fine by whatever # thousand you're on, rounded up, and again by 5. For example, say you had 3,519 0ads. Rounded up, it'd be 4,000, so 4 times the offense. If the offense was worth 100 coins, that'd be 400, times 5 again = 2,000 coins as the total fine.

    Ex. 2, to see how it works with higher numbers. Current 0ad's = 12,385, and same fine worth. Thus, 12 x 100 x 5 = 6,000 for the fine.

    Ex. 3, with lower numbers. Current 0ad's = 50, same offense worth. Thus, 1 (first 1,000) x 100 x 5 = 500...we'd have to have another formula for 0ad levels under 1000.

  5. Some ideas i thought about while talking with Tim:

    1. Everyone starts with 20 currency.

    2. If you perform an offense, you get fined.

    3. Depending on the nature of the offense, more money gets fined. I.E., a racial slur might be offendable by 50 coins, whereas using foul language only 10.

    4. When you get to 0, you get banned.

    5. You only get "paid" for a post if it has 20 or more words (to prevent spam money).

×
×
  • Create New...