@GotToDie
imo both team decide secretly which civs to ban, say it to a referee who announce the result.
then teams choose ( secretly again ) the civs for each players, the position for each players, say it to a referee that place players and civs.
it forces to train 5 civs instead of 3
Well mainly ego i guess x')
But here visually i'am somehow close to you, not half your skills
I've made my own graph about whether i like your graph or not, and why.
Visually it looks like i dislike your graph, but in fact you did a great job !
Massive paint skill haha
edit ( again) : My point is that not starting bar graphs at 0 is a common way in media to make data say whatever you want. imagine it's a survey for election
MarAurele made a huge point : player want to play with their friends.
But i want to get as much teams as possible. i'd better play with a team with my average skill, and play 3-4 group phase matchs an let better team play finals with direct elimination, than have less team playing !
What about register as duos/solo and then make 4 players team ?
edit : 8 teams would be so great ! 2 groups, each team play with each other in their group, then the 2 better team in each groups play direct elimination matches/BO3
it's 3 matches for everyone with 2 semi final matches for 4 players and 1 final match for 2 players