Jump to content

The Crooked Philosopher

Community Members
  • Posts

    110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by The Crooked Philosopher

  1. There's evidence that Pathian recruit Median infantry and Cadusii infantry against Marcus Antonius invasion. So why don't just create special urbanization phase for them to unlock these units. By giving the Parthians a special urbanization phase, we could turn a horse archer based civilization into a balanced civilization which incorporate both Medians, Persians and other ethnics in Persia.

    I am fan like who have always anticipated the day when the Sassanid become a playable civilization in both campaign and custom battle. i mean no ill will against your hope to make Sassanid as a playable faction but i hope both of us could see our long anticipated faction could become playable. As a new member of the forum, i hope i could see the game become a success that no other game could match, but after all, i am not the one who made the decision.

    Anyway i wish you good luck.

  2. Well, why don't just make them both (Parthians and Sassanids) as major faction because there's long journey before Sassanids and the Early Eastern Roman Empire would appear in the Part 2. Since this game principal was what if these civilization confronted each other in a battlefield, it would be fun for these civilization face each other in the custom battle.

    Anyway, we should not stray too far from our original topic.

  3. I have some suggestions for the Parthians, by giving the Parthians a sandbox scenario like Romans have in the "We are Legion" scenario against certain civilization for player to understand the Parthian tactics and strategies. Meanwhile players could develop their own countermeasures against the Parthians.

  4. Speaking about the mini factions, i think Parthians should receive more attention than any other mini factions because some faction like Pontus, Galatia, Numidians, Jews and the rebels have little potential to become a major factions in 0 AD. Personally i would like to see the Parthians appear in 0 AD's expansion.

  5. Sorry for the interruption, there's some severe error on your period list about the Mongols. Gokturk and Khitan Liao belongs to a different race despite being a nomad people and the Mongol army lists was a little bit inaccurate.

  6. I have some photos from TW Center, it seems the Europa Barbarorum II team have some clues about the Mauryan army, here's some examples:

    spearmen2g.jpg

    Kauntikas (Indian Spearmen)

    longbowmen.jpg

    Cāpadhara Yoddhṛ (Indian Longbowmen)

    swordsmenf.jpg

    Kṣatriya Khaḍgacarmadharas (Indian Swordsmen)

    macemen.jpg

    Kṣatriya Gadāhasta Yoddhṛ (Indian Macemen)

    chariotrt.jpg

    Kṣatriya Ᾱrya Rathas (Indian Chariot Archers)

    elephantz.jpg

    (Indian Elephants)

    lightcav.jpg

    Laghu Aśvānīka (Indian Light Cavalry)

  7. I've heard Europa Barbarorum II have create their own Indian faction called Taksashila or Mauryan satrapy and they have done a lot of research about the Indian military and other Mauryan Indian related subjects.

    http://www.twcenter....php?t=466774%29

    I've found a helpful site which will aid your cause:

    http://www.bharatadesam.com/literature/kautilya_arthashastra/arthashastra.php

×
×
  • Create New...