Jump to content

Vingauld

Community Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    136

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Vingauld

  2. Suggestions for 0 A.D.

    in Gameplay Discussion

    Posted

    How about allowing fortresses and towers to be abandoned if there are no units garrisoned inside? For example, in order for a player to keep a fortress in their possession they must garrison one or more units inside or else any other player can take the fortress by moving their own units inside.

    In that case I will only play 1vs1 :) Or they should lincrease the pop limit to 300. In those days batlles where with huge armies and people want realism right ?

  3. Suggestions for 0 A.D.

    in Gameplay Discussion

    Posted

    It is an ok idea. One of the cons is that if you have to garrison towers the units are using your population limit, but if you deside to use them in an attack your camp/base/vilage/ wil be left undefended against other enemys (2vs2 or something) and that kinda sucks

  4. Suggestions for 0 A.D.

    in Gameplay Discussion

    Posted

    I don't think mere mortals could get a boulder big enough to crush people going fast enough to crush people before they got outta the way. The only way to do it would be with hills...but that's getting into a lot of micromanaging.

    I actualy ment rolling it from a hill..

    but he it won`t be in game anyway

  5. Suggestions for 0 A.D.

    in Gameplay Discussion

    Posted · Edited by Vingauld

    Well, rolling boulders and stuff works better in a game where you're one person moving around rather than an RTS game.

    I think it works great in an RTS game because then you can roll a big boulder on a big army, so you kill a big part of this army, so your soldiers will have less dificulty in defeating this army.

  10. 0 A.D. and TLA merge!

    in Announcements / News

    Posted

    I totaly disagree with this merging, but hey, i`m just a community member i wont have no influence. I don`t really like the lord of the rings genre anymore, it has been overused, i got fed up with it. Anyway I really liked the whole setting and civs from 0ad so that`s why i am active in the 0ad community and not the other one. I was really looking forward to the release of 0ad no matter how long it would take, i am fed op with playing AOM al the time i just hate those mythic beasts, but now there will be surreal thingies in 0ad to, IT SUCKS

    OK THIS WAS NOT FUNNY

    well maybe just a little

    Mod Note: I took the liberty of combining all your three posts. In the futrue refrain from double posting, let alone triple posting. Just use the Edit button ~ Randy

  20. New Screenshots - 12-03-04

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    I guess that would be nice,but it also takes extra of bandwith when the images are larger (i`ve got ADSL so i don`t have to worrie about downloading times, but some people have got more slow connection speeds and will have to wait veeeeeery long before they can finally see the pictures)

  22. Suggestions for 0 A.D.

    in Gameplay Discussion

    Posted

    Iwas just wondering; will you be able to see how many units are gathering each type of resource in your in-game display, this would be a nice feature, because it would be much more effective then trying to look for all my (for example) woodgathering units on the map by myself when i want to know how much more i should build

  24. Level Of French

    in Introductions & Off-Topic Discussion

    Posted

    I have had 3 years of France education at school, but i can only remember a few sentences. At the end of my third year on my school i had tochoose between French or German (English was standart) I choose for German, because i suck in french. Now im in my last year on this school, so i wonder what foreign languages classes i`ll have to attend at my next school (whateverer that school maybe)

×
×
  • Create New...