Jump to content

lilstewie

Community Members
  • Posts

    532
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by lilstewie

  1. ^^^^^^^

    Plus, a lot of the structures now are overwhelmingly stone based.

    Or have the brick marks visible(CC, Barracks, etc, etc). When in fact they were mostly wood or plastered over like this.

    Oj8iz.jpg

    No stone, brick marks should be shown.

    jCLTOuW.jpg

    8IfM9xx.jpg\

    a7N8jKy.jpg

    indianarchitecture4.jpg

    Chanakya show does an amazing job at recreating that era accurately.

    Now compare to this texture.

    http://www.wildfireg...&attach_id=4993

    http://www.wildfireg...100#entry259122

    This is because you guys went back to Egg inspired original Mauryan work i think.

    IpQQJ.jpg

  2. Yes please, walls are more important :)

    lilstewie's already shown us that some stupa's weren't plastered at all - so both the unplastered and partly plastered versions will be used and are 'historically' sound.

    Such large stupas would be plastered for sure. People would probably think it was unfinished if they saw a large stupa with brick marks still showing.

    The example below is rather small, humble. Amd also atypical because it doesnt have plaster over the bricks.

    sanchi-figures.jpg

  3. Do you mean a full-white-plastered stupa? All references show the bricks :-/

    Do we want a white boring stupa then? I just want to hear more opinions :S

    It's up to you guys, but historically they plastered pretty much a lot of things. Including stupas. I personally also like what you have too.

    In the reliefs they would make those brick marks visible.. Like examples below.

    5yCfNsM.jpg?1

    enyshn2.jpg

    SKZtqcs.jpg

    rprXZvx.jpg

    ^^^

    Above shows walls, etc with bricks without plaster over it.

    If you look at most of the stupas they have plaster over it.

    JMnMg.jpg?1

    QxqcHjb.jpg

    WM7r0.jpg

    etc

    This is the only one below I have seen without a layer of plaster. It's a small one.

    sanchi-figures.jpg

    great-stupa-sanchi-india-10-b-c-e-15-c-e.jpg

    sanchi_stupa-1b.jpg

    You can see a layer of plaster still on it.

  4. The Ptolemics had a dynasty that 300 years. They had an excellent economy and military. It is just the fact that the Ptolemic kingdom is a hybrid of cultures is why I am guessing that some people do not like the Ptolemics to be included in the game?

    I thought they were a hybrid culture, but I have been reading that their military make up is basically Macedonian. But they obviously had to hire natives later on.

    Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    While the Seleucids military is very diverse.

    But, yeah, Enrqiue and Lordgood have started work already so it's pointless.

  5. Is it 100% set in stone that Ptoemaic Kingdom will be the next faction?

    Because there are other interesting factions with interesting units and civ.

    Like

    Kingdom of Pontus

    http://en.wikipedia....ngdom_of_Pontus

    Kingdom of Armenia

    http://en.wikipedia....nia_(antiquity)

    Seleucids empire

    http://en.wikipedia....Seleucid_Empire

    Seleucids in a way connects Mauryans to the rest. And their rooster is pretty amazing!

    seleucid_war_elephant_large.jpeg

    seleucid23vf.jpg

    AW_38_Battle_of_Magnesia_191_BC.jpg

    seleucidreformedarmy05.jpg

    2133609418_f31e86632e_z.jpg?zz=1

  6. Well, judging by the civilizations, especially the original six, yes.

    http://wildfiregames...d/page.php?c=38

    Not really

    The first edition of 0 A.D. will allow the player to control any of six ancient civilisations from the pre-common era. Each culture will be represented at the peak of its civilisation, somewhere along the timeline of 500 B.C. to 1 B.C.

    They even put the Mauryans in who arent even close to the Mediterranean. So it's not completely restricted to that area.

×
×
  • Create New...