Jump to content

Cassius Allanus

Community Members
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Cassius Allanus

  1. The Romans didn't "persecute" the Christians for directly religious reasons though. They made it illegal because the majority of Christians were refusing to profess loyalty to the Emperor in Rome.

    Also, though the Romans did try to stop Christianity in it's tracks via fairly brutal methods, what about the Celts, Germanics and Slavs? The Celts capitulated very quickly to the Church (probably because of the near-universal pagan belief of tolerance), as did the Slavs (though they were lucky to be farther away, out of the Church's direct grasp of power), but the Germanics, and especially the Vikings, managed to resist for a while. Some say that the Viking raid on the monastery at Lindisfarne was in retaliation for the slaughter of pagan Germanics in Saxony by Charlemagne under orders from Rome, and the Vikings finding out about it and retaliating was certainly within their power (especially so with the Swedes) as they used the leiĆ°angr system of organizing defensive navies and raiding expeditions. ( It was the maritime version of the Germanic system of hundreds which was described as early as 98 A.D. by Tacitus as the centeni. Since Tacitus also said that the Swedes (Suiones) had a powerful fleet, it seems likely that it was based on the leidang.)

    After all this, I should point out that Christianity wasn't the only religion to exercise such brutal practices in its quest for expansion. Before it became the predominant religion of the Hebrews, Judaism had undergone drastic changes from its African pagan ancestry to turn into the people with the very morals Caesar89 gave several examples of. The other one is Islam. It has a similar story of expansion when compared with Christianity and Judaism, and well, here's a pattern: All three religions are related. Islam and Christianity both descend from Judaism. I'm not an anti-Semite, but the Semitic religions have time and time again shonw themselves to be arrogant and intolerant of others.

  2. Good article, but I'm actually quite relieved that it didn't chronicle the rise of the religion, since it is usually depicted as being peaceful, missionaries going to teach the "barbaric" heathens, etc. In truth the whole process of expanding Christianity was brutal and cruel, with many innocent pagans being slaughtered. (Especially the Germanics, who resisted the most.)

  3. You're partially right :)

    A: The Altaic language family, which includes Turkish, Korean, Japanese, and Mongolian.

    Although arguing that the Bantu are now the best represented is valid because BHG added them into RoN as a language group instead of as the individual tribes (ie. Zulu)

    Among the most poorly represented groups are the Indo-Europeans, but that's because there are so many Indo-European branches like Germanic, Slavic, Celtic, Latin, Hellenic, and Indo-Iranian, and all of those divide up even further.

    Another poorly represented group are the Sino-Tibetans (ie. Chinese).

    Not to mention there are lots of groups that are not even represented, such as the Austroasiatics or the Finno-Ugrics.

  4. because the time period we are doing for them is well after they stopped fighting buff (which ended in the 3rd century BC, at least in mainland Europe).

    Yes, but not in Britain. The Scots continued to fight naked all the way up until the battle at Stirling. :D ( B) I guess the closest the film makers for Braveheart could get to that was having them moon the English)

  5. Awesome! This is the first game I've seen that will have the ability to make some decent mountains. ie. The mountains in AoK look like dirt hills LOL.....But this is sweet B)

×
×
  • Create New...