I'm sorry, apparently, I misunderstood your statement; I thought you were asserting that seducing powerful men was indeed Cleopatra's only serious contribution to history, which is not accurate. I agree with you that that is what she is most famous for to most people. However, I certainly don't think that that should be the basis for which heroes are chosen to be in 0 A.D. I also don't think the heroes necessarily have to be chosen due to military command skills alone, as diplomatic skill was and is very important as well (although this is not [yet?] well-represented in the game) and Cleopatra was a skilled diplomat. I am no historian, and it's a very debatable point, but I would certainly not call her an "incompetent" military leader either, despite Actium. I wouldn't actually argue that she is a "better" hero than Arsinoe II to include, but I would argue that she is not a worse choice. The limit of 3 heroes per civilization is arbitrary anyway, so why not include both of them?