[MSVC11 support]

Too bad, I haven't seen a installer for the debug libraries either and they are not in "Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 SP1 Redistributable" included, only the release one afaik.

I think you get them only with a fresh install of VS2008.

I had to download them manually from untrustworthy source.

[MSVC11 support]

Just found out that msvcr90d.dll is missing in the binaries/system folder.

This prevents running 0 A.D. in debug mode (if you dont copy it there yourself), other debug dll's like msvcr80d.dll or msvcr71d.dll are provided, this one is missing.

I think its created by automated build but not versioned, can you add it Ben?

edit: same goes for msvcp90d.dll and msvcp71d.dll, they are missing too (but I think think they are needed).

[MSVC11 support]

Thanks, I can now compile 0 A.D. without any modifications at the source, just building boost libs and putting them in the appropriate folder.

[MSVC11 support]

We should just upgrade the Windows boost libs, but build them with VC2008 rather than a newer edition

You mean only build them with vc9?

Thats fine for me, bulding boost isn't a problem.

And about Windows 2000, I think it's safe to drop the support for it.

[MSVC11 support]

Hello community, happy new year all,

I would like to contribute to 0 A.D. development but I'm working with Visual Studio 2012.

The generated solution for 2010 is compatible, boost 1.44 is not because of a problem with a initializer_list include.

I created a patch for msvc11, build the boost 1.44 libraries with it and made it work.

Any chance of adding Visual Studio 2012 support to 0 A.D. ? I could provide the boost 1.44 libraries build with msvc11.

Patch: http://pastebin.com/YZRwdbLX

Other option is using newest boost version (1.52), it has msvc11 support, so no need changing source.

I tested 1.52 with 0 A.D. and could provide msvc11 libs too.