Rosi

Too bad, I haven't seen a installer for the debug libraries either and they are not in "Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 SP1 Redistributable" included, only the release one afaik. I think you get them only with a fresh install of VS2008. I had to download them manually from untrustworthy source.

Just found out that msvcr90d.dll is missing in the binaries/system folder. This prevents running 0 A.D. in debug mode (if you dont copy it there yourself), other debug dll's like msvcr80d.dll or msvcr71d.dll are provided, this one is missing. I think its created by automated build but not versioned, can you add it Ben? edit: same goes for msvcp90d.dll and msvcp71d.dll, they are missing too (but I think think they are needed).

Thanks, I can now compile 0 A.D. without any modifications at the source, just building boost libs and putting them in the appropriate folder.

You mean only build them with vc9? Thats fine for me, bulding boost isn't a problem. And about Windows 2000, I think it's safe to drop the support for it.

Hello community, happy new year all, I would like to contribute to 0 A.D. development but I'm working with Visual Studio 2012. The generated solution for 2010 is compatible, boost 1.44 is not because of a problem with a initializer_list include. I created a patch for msvc11, build the boost 1.44 libraries with it and made it work. Any chance of adding Visual Studio 2012 support to 0 A.D. ? I could provide the boost 1.44 libraries build with msvc11. Patch: http://pastebin.com/YZRwdbLX Other option is using newest boost version (1.52), it has msvc11 support, so no need changing source. I tested 1.52 with 0 A.D. and could provide msvc11 libs too.