I don't know if anyone has posted what I got to say before and I lacked the inclination to read 47 pages of forum. So sorry if this is a repeat.
My ideas are thus:
1: Please don't have archers be able to bring down stone walls. It pisses me off to no end, in AoE for example, when a giant stone wall is brought down by plinky little arrows. Fire arrows against wood walls is one thing, but you need big siege weapons to bring down a stone wall.
2:Please don't over power one civ. It may not be historically accurate but keep the balance. For example in Rome: Total War the Romans stomped over everything once they got legionaries because the legionaries had armor, damage, health, and numbers out the yin yang. I just say this because I want to play the Celts in 0 A.D., and I know if you're TOO accurate they will get stomped on by every other civ you put in the game.
Suggestions for 0 A.D.
in Gameplay Discussion
Posted
I don't know if anyone has posted what I got to say before and I lacked the inclination to read 47 pages of forum. So sorry if this is a repeat.
My ideas are thus:
1: Please don't have archers be able to bring down stone walls. It pisses me off to no end, in AoE for example, when a giant stone wall is brought down by plinky little arrows. Fire arrows against wood walls is one thing, but you need big siege weapons to bring down a stone wall.
2:Please don't over power one civ. It may not be historically accurate but keep the balance. For example in Rome: Total War the Romans stomped over everything once they got legionaries because the legionaries had armor, damage, health, and numbers out the yin yang. I just say this because I want to play the Celts in 0 A.D., and I know if you're TOO accurate they will get stomped on by every other civ you put in the game.
kthnxbai, ~atticus