Jump to content

[Part II] Faction: The Chinese (Song Dynasty)


wolflance
 Share

Recommended Posts

@Wolflance:

Hey dude noticed you updated the unit roster again. So the nest of bees got removed coz it was cart mounted, that's cool. But IMO don't remove handheld rocket launchers alltogether. If you go to chapter 126 of Wubei Zhi you get an illustration of men with handheld rocket launchers called "Fire Dragon Arrows" (火龍箭). Ming Rocket Launcher infantry are so iconic and awesome we have to include it!

Edited by Ayakashi
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Wolflance:

Hey dude noticed you updated the unit roster again. So the nest of bees got removed coz it was cart mounted, that's cool. But IMO don't remove handheld rocket launchers alltogether. If you go to chapter 126 of Wubei Zhi you get an illustration of men with handheld rocket launchers called "Fire Dragon Arrows" (火龍箭). Ming Rocket Launcher infantry are so iconic and awesome we have to include it!

Don't worry, it is just temporary. At the very least 九龍筒 was in use (in 1464AD). Edited by wolflance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

No Zhanmadao!? (Lol only just noticed now!)

Perhaps we could have Zhanmadao wielders as a champion infantry for the Song reform to even the numbers with the Ming? Or as a 'normal' infantry that upgrades to some kind of Changdao swordsmen for the Ming upgrade? Whatever works best.

Loving the new reference pics! Where did you find all these replicas? Especially the costume, ships and firearms.

Edited by Ayakashi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Zhanmadao!? (Lol only just noticed now!)

Perhaps we could have Zhanmadao wielders as a champion infantry for the Song reform to even the numbers with the Ming? Or as a 'normal' infantry that upgrades to some kind of Changdao swordsmen for the Ming upgrade? Whatever works best.

Loving the new reference pics! Where did you find all these replicas? Especially the costume, ships and firearms.

I categorized Zhanmadao as 'Glaive', similar to Guandao/Podao as it suppose to be. Heavy axemen and the reform 1 champion infantry will be using it.

(The massive two-handed 'katana' version did not appear until sixteenth century, and it was never called zhanmadao until Qing Dynasty).

Knowing the right keywords and Google-fu can get you very far :pleasantry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weren't song Zhanmadaos basically a very long straight single edged sword that's roughly 2/3 blade and 1/3 handle? Does that count as a glaive? Well nice to know you haven't forgotten them! What were they called during the Song?

I think I know what you mean by the 'katana' version: those Ming miao daos which were supposedly reverse engineered from Japanese pirates? That wasn't what I had in mind! I own one of these. Most kung-fu weapons now days are post 19th century anyway! I've been doing kung-fu and wushu for like 15 years so at least I know that much :D

Edited by Ayakashi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weren't song Zhanmadaos basically a very long straight single edged sword that's roughly 2/3 blade and 1/3 handle? Well nice to know you haven't forgotten them! What were they called during the Song? Maybe I should check that Wujing Zongyao in a bit.

I think I know what you mean by the 'katana' version: those Ming miao daos which were supposedly reverse engineered from Japanese pirates? That wasn't what I had in mind! I own one of these. Most kung-fu weapons now days are post 19th century anyway! I've been doing kung-fu and wushu for like 15 years so at least I know that much :D

Actually we don't have any drawings of Song-period Zhanmadao.

It was called MaZha Dao (麻札刀) during Song time. A weapon with the name of MaZha Zhanmadao (麻札斩马刀) was recorded in Ming-period 明会典, alongside normal zhanmadao, So I can assume with certain confidence, that Song Zhanmadao follows the Ming definition.

The Song version have a ring pommel instead of a butt spike.

A Ming period Zhanmadao, from Wu Bei Yao Lue (武备要略)

zhanmadao1.png
Edited by wolflance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, maybe the weapon I described was closer to a Tang Dynasty Modao. Would you say the blade to pole ratio would be the same or the blade would be longer in the Song version? I've read up somewhere before that the Modao was more or less a precursor to this weapon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Yeah, maybe the weapon I described was closer to a Tang Dynasty Modao. Would you say the blade to pole ratio would be the same or the blade would be longer in the Song version? I've read up somewhere before that the Modao was more or less a precursor to this weapon.
The only thing in common (between a MoDao and a Zhanmadao) is that they are both compared to the Han Dynasty ZhanmaJIAN.
AFAIK MoDao is double-edged, total length is one zhang/300~360cm (but ratio of blade to handle unknown). Beyond that, we don't really know anything about this weapon. It could be a polearm or a two-handed sword, or somewhere in between.
Song Dynasty Zhanmadao has a blade of three chi (~93cm)and a crossguard length of one chi (~31cm). It has a ring pommel. Handle length unknown.
Speaking of MoDao, I should go and re-read your Tang Dynasty thread.
Edited by wolflance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just remembered I came across this webpage a while ago:

http://thomaschen.freewebspace.com/catalog.html

It shows what's supposedly an excavated Song dynasty zhanmadao along with a stone mural depiction (or at least what the author believes is).

That sword on Thomas Chen's website does fit several description of Song Zhanmadao - roughly 93cm blade length and ring pommel, etc.

The '31cm crossguard (鐔长尺余)' description is ambiguous though. The chinese for crossguard/tsuba is '鐔', but a 30+cm crossguard is massive, and not very common on Chinese swords. If the 鐔 here means 'hilt' , then it make much more sense.

Note: There are some Song-period scribes that equate Zhanmadao with Tang Dynasty MoDao. So maybe there are some similarities.

Several Candidates for Song period Zhanmadao:

Shorter blade, but longer handle.

ktDlUeg.jpg

A version without (or missing) ring pommel. Possibly Liao Dynasty.

dBSlqMI.jpg

Edited by wolflance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Found this interesting link with pics of models of some of the ships used in the Ming treasure fleet (and some other ships too):

http://www.hanfu.hk/forum/viewthread.php?action=printable&tid=3647

(The last couple of models in the bottom are no so good though)

Some examples and caption for those who don't read Chinese:

20081001_609be39369a005ccd57dr1ufL8nOpI9

Treasure Ship: 125.65m long by 50.9m wide. Displacement 14800tons. 9 masts, 12 sails.

20081001_51b03985b987ed2392famVUv01InRfo

Horse Ship: 104.7m long by 42.4m wide

20081001_9dfa53bece78c947f9aa8DsQIcmDZd6

Troop Transport Ship: 67.9m long, 19.4m wide. Displacement 2000tons.

20081001_7ebc5ab6437b3fa3cb8apqnsBvyS2le

Warship: 50.9m long by 19.2 m wide. Displacement 1700tons. (IMO, this model don't look the part! Maybe they mixed up the pictures?)

As nice as those are, IMHO I still prefer the replicas from IOACS: http://ioacs.org/collection.html

IMG_2048.jpg

A Song Dynasty Paddle Ship

IMG_2334.jpg

Ming Treasure Ship

IMG_2374.jpg

Ming "Fengzhou" Ship; (Might be out of time-frame by just a few years/decades) around 50m long.

Edited by Ayakashi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just thought of an idea. What if instead of building free standing fortresses, the Chinese faction can instead upgrade individual gates into huge fortified gatehouses for an expensive amount of stone and wood provided there is enough space, as they will be much wider than regular gates. Maybe have them have between 1/2 to 3/4 the hit points of normal castles, and like fortresses can maybe garrison 20 infantry, cannot be built too close to each other and also has a light cannon attack, and unlike regular gates, infantry garrisoned inside are fully protected and the upgrade is not instant.

The reason I thought of this is because it might be too OP for China to have castles or fortresses separate from the civic center whereas all the European factions won't, and AFAIK China didn't have a tradition of building large standalone castles. However, China would still need a "castle-like" structure, so I guess you can call this a compromise. But IMO it can be another thing that makes the faction stand out.

12698176.jpg

So, using the this diagram of Nanjing's Zhonghuamen from Early Ming as an example, we can have regular gates look like the smaller ones, whilst upgraded gatehouses will look like the big one.

But then that leaves the question of where to train advanced units? Maybe some form of advanced barracks? Or a palace like in my Part 1 proposal?

Edited by Ayakashi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just thought of an idea. What if instead of building free standing fortresses, the Chinese faction can instead upgrade individual gates into huge fortified gatehouses for an expensive amount of stone and wood provided there is enough space, as they will be much wider than regular gates. Maybe have them have between 1/2 to 3/4 the hit points of normal castles, and like fortresses can maybe garrison 20 infantry, cannot be built too close to each other and also has a light cannon attack, and unlike regular gates, infantry garrisoned inside are fully protected and the upgrade is not instant.

The reason I thought of this is because it might be too OP for China to have castles or fortresses separate from the civic center whereas all the European factions won't, and AFAIK China didn't have a tradition of building large standalone castles. However, China would still need a "castle-like" structure, so I guess you can call this a compromise. But IMO it can be another thing that makes the faction stand out.

So, using the this diagram of Nanjing's Zhonghuamen from Early Ming as an example, we can have regular gates look like the smaller ones, whilst upgraded gatehouses will look like the big one.

But then that leaves the question of where to train advanced units? Maybe some form of advanced barracks? Or a palace like in my Part 1 proposal?

Image link is broken, so I can't see the "upgraded gate" you mentioned.

If I am not mistaken, Song period was one of the period where stand-alone fortresses wouldn't be out of place, as they constructed a defensive network of fortresses and signal towers to deter Western Xia attack.

Although Song Dynasty Forbidden Army was in theory a palace guard unit, in reality they were the only functioning military unit in the empire, i.e. They were 'ordinary' and did not hold any special prestige, thus not very suitable to train from a 'Palace' building. (We will have to consider after reform 2 the new Ming Dynasty troops were citizen-soldier too).

Edited by wolflance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm... well, I guess to get an idea of what they should look like you can just look at the surviving gate towers of Nanjing, Beijing, and Xi'an.

I thought that Song champions except Beiwei would be trained from barracks, because what's the point of dedicating a whole building to one weak militia unit? Shouldn't they be trained from the civic center instead?

Maybe what we can have is fortresses for the Song, and fortified gatehouses and palaces for the Ming. Song fortress train Beiwei units, and Ming palace trains Ming champions. Such buildings and units wouldn't normally be available until phase 3 and post reform anyway.

Edited by Ayakashi
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm... well, I guess to get an idea of what they should look like you can just look at the surviving gate towers of Nanjing, Beijing, and Xi'an.

I thought that Song champions except Beiwei would be trained from barracks, because what's the point of dedicating a whole building to one weak militia unit? Shouldn't they be trained from the civic center instead?

Maybe what we can have is fortresses for the Song, and fortified gatehouses and palaces for the Ming. Song fortress train Beiwei units, and Ming palace trains Ming champions. Such buildings and units wouldn't normally be available until phase 3 and post reform anyway.

By gate, you mean something like this?

CzvVgQC.jpg

The 'weak militia' (Xiang bing) are supposedly to be available from the civic center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope this works:

post-15249-0-85308100-1433791656_thumb.j

It shows the destroyed main gate which is the one I'm on about.

IMHO, maybe it's much too early to talk about Ming Dynasty now! As it's likely this mod will now be made of 3 parts, the Ming should be a separate faction altogether for part 3, which is going to be quite some time in the future. Save the Ming part of the proposal somewhere though for future reference!

However perhaps we can still preserve some of that 'reform tech'? We can maybe have the part 2 Chinese faction be able to choose between Southern Song or Jin as part of their phase 3 upgrade or something else? Which unlocks corresponding advanced units.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think to have to choose between dynasties that existed in parallel would be better, and IMO would also be more meaningful if the difference is clearer as in Jin vs Southern Song, like having to choose between having strong cavalry or heavy infantry. It will also mean opportunities for people to make campaign or scenarios about wars between the two such as a campaign about Yue Fei.

I guess you can always have pre-reform tech represented by Northern Song.

Edited by Ayakashi
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think to have to choose between dynasties that existed in parallel would be better, and IMO would also be more meaningful if the difference is clearer as in Jin vs Southern Song, like having to choose between having strong cavalry or heavy infantry. It will also mean opportunities for people to make campaign or scenarios about wars between the two such as a campaign about Yue Fei.

I guess you can always have pre-reform tech represented by Northern Song.

Good idea, although I cannot decide whether to choose from Jin, Liao, Xi Xia, or even Mongols.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jin would be the obvious choice really. They were simply bigger and had a bigger population of Han Chinese, and occupied much of former Song territory but still co-existed with the Song, though violently, so the continuity makes sense. The Liao got destroyed quite early in this time frame, and the Xi Xia I feel are just not as big. The Mongols should obviously be a separate faction!

Edited by Ayakashi
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jin would be the obvious choice really. They were simply bigger and had a bigger population of Han Chinese, and occupied much of former Song territory but still co-existed with the Song, though violently, so the continuity makes sense. The Liao got destroyed quite early in this time frame, and the Xi Xia I feel are just not as big. The Mongols should obviously be a separate faction!

Each has their own charm and unique unit - Jin has the Iron Pagoda cataphract and the so-called "chained horse"/Guai Zi Ma (with dubious historicity), Liao has Iron Forest Army, Eagle Army and Elite scout.

Xi Xia has Iron Sparrowhawk cataphract, Mountain Infantry, Elite Slavetaker, Camel trebuchet, gunpowder grenades and bronze cannon (they are one of the possible 'way' that we can get cannons for the Chinese for part 2) . They also has the best sword, Shen Bi Nu crossbow (this one was reverse-engineered by the Song fairly early though), and extremely tough cold-hardened iron armour.

Edited by wolflance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Xi Xia are awesome indeed! But as I said the primary reason I'd go for the Jin is because they conquered Northern Song Territory, thus makes the most sense as a reform tech.

However, I think a way we can get them both represented is instead of reform tech we split 'China' into sub factions in the same way the Greeks are in the vanilla game. So we can have Song, Jin and western Xia, all sharing generic assets like architecture and basic units, but also having distinctive special units and wonders. That will mean more work though, so I don't know how the CoM will react!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Xi Xia are awesome indeed! But as I said the primary reason I'd go for the Jin is because they conquered Northern Song Territory, thus makes the most sense as a reform tech.

However, I think a way we can get them both represented is instead of reform tech we split 'China' into sub factions in the same way the Greeks are in the vanilla game. So we can have Song, Jin and western Xia, all sharing generic assets like architecture and basic units, but also having distinctive special units and wonders. That will mean more work though, so I don't know how the CoM will react!

Yes, I am inclined to choose Jin as well, because they are also the only faction that 'make sense' to appear in Song army. Song and Jin did formed an alliance to destroy Liao, after all (It came back to bite them in the @#$%, but that is beside the point XD)

Then again, there are many historical source that suggest that Iron Pagoda is actually a type of heavy infantry (instead of Cataphract).

Edited by wolflance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just read your update.

As I've mentioned in the previous reply: if it was me, considering the split of part 2 and that we're not doing the branching into specialized sub-factions late game anymore, I would've split the Chinese (maybe sinicized factions is a better term) into the Jin, Xi Xia, and Song, as 3 separate factions/sub-factions, just like the Greeks in the vanilla game. I think a consensus among the CoM on this is needed 'cause I don't know if they would want 3 Chinese style factions, although IMO it shouldn't be much more work than the current proposal since buildings and most basic units will likely be shared. But it's probably too early for that right now.

I reckon you've done great work on this update, but the seemingly lack of any strong units other than maybe the Jin ones from Reform 1 I find a bit concerning. I know this is meant to reflect the troubled state China was facing at the time especially their army, but I can't help but feel this amount of nerfing almost unintentionally evokes the stereotype of the suicidal human wave that is too often applied to historical Chinese armies, and which we should do well to avoid. Winning purely through sheer numbers won't work IMO, considering that you need to train loads of military laborers just to build and maintain a strong defense. This is going to cost population points and will result in a smaller army than the other faction made of weaker units. IMO this is either begging to get roflstomped, or if the player is a good turtle will result in 2 hour stalemates. A massive population bonus might help but I doubt it's applicable because of the adjustable pop cap. Therefore, I think you should include at least one or two of decently strong "true" champion units such as re-adding the Beiwei.

Otherwise a great update to the proposal overall! Must've been a huge effort starting all over again and it easily puts mine to shame! :thumbsup:

Edited by Ayakashi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Stan` pinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...