Jump to content

Goths and Germanics


Keaton the Wise
 Share

Recommended Posts

Romans did not differentiate between Celts and Germans until around the time of Caesar. Some Celts were Germanic like the Belgae. The Greeks called the Celts Galatians for the place they invaded, which also included a Belgic tribe.

Edited by greycat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Romans did not differentiate between Celts and Germans until around the time of Caesar. Some Celts were Germanic like the Belgae. The Greeks called the Celts Galatians for the place they invaded, which also included a Belgic tribe.

are you saying the the germanics were "representated" by celtic faction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are you saying the the germanics were "representated" by celtic faction?

In the sense that the idea of a German was not yet invented by Romans until the end period of game, you could look at that way. Romans did deal with a tribe called the Teutons which came to be another name for German. The problem as that even the Teuton tribe could have been Celtic.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary
1 : a member of an ancient probably Germanic or Celtic people
Edited by greycat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the sense that the idea of a German was not yet invented by Romans until the end period of game, you could look at that way. Romans did deal with a tribe called the Teutons which came to be another name for German. The problem as that even the Teuton tribe could have been Celtic.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary
1 : a member of an ancient probably Germanic or Celtic people

that means the if i want a "personal" germanic faction in only need disable the fortresses??, or put the brit fortress but smaller and weaker?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some differences off hand I can think of are they would not have druids, They didn't live in cities like the Gauls... so probably not a fortress like you said. I will try to come up with a better outline but I should do some more research first.

Edited by greycat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Germanic wars with Rome within time frame of game.

Edited by greycat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we did the Belgae (Gallo-Germanic) they would be more Celtic and they also had conflict with Rome.

(Talking about the Gallic tribes)

"Of all these, the Belgae are the bravest, because they are furthest from the civilization and refinement of [our] Province, and merchants least frequently resort to them, and import those things which tend to effeminate the mind; and they are the nearest to the Germans, who dwell beyond the Rhine, with whom they are continually waging war; for which reason the Helvetii also surpass the rest of the Gauls in valor, as they contend with the Germans in almost daily battles, when they either repel them from their own territories, or themselves wage war on their frontiers.

Source: The Gallic Wars by Julius Caesar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the major reason we're holding off on the Germanics until Part 2 is that we can't throw every culture into Part 1. Also, the Germans were such a large part of Rome's eventual fall that they fit thematically better in Part 2. Also, while the Romans and other cultures fought the Germans in Part 1's time frame, their activities in the Part 2 timeframe were so momentous it's just better to have them in Part 2 instead.


I think we could have up to 3 Germanics in Part 2, and maybe 1 Celto-Germanic (Belgians would be my pick), like how the Macedonians straddle the Greek and Successors "cultures" in Part 1. So, Belgians would have some textures and models from both the Gauls and Germans art sets and probably share some bonuses from each.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the major reason we're holding off on the Germanics until Part 2 is that we can't throw every culture into Part 1. Also, the Germans were such a large part of Rome's eventual fall that they fit thematically better in Part 2. Also, while the Romans and other cultures fought the Germans in Part 1's time frame, their activities in the Part 2 timeframe were so momentous it's just better to have them in Part 2 instead.

I think we could have up to 3 Germanics in Part 2, and maybe 1 Celto-Germanic (Belgians would be my pick), like how the Macedonians straddle the Greek and Successors "cultures" in Part 1. So, Belgians would have some textures and models from both the Gauls and Germans art sets and probably share some bonuses from each.

This makes sense. Also they didn't really notice they were different than the Celts until the end period of game. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the major reason we're holding off on the Germanics until Part 2 is that we can't throw every culture into Part 1. Also, the Germans were such a large part of Rome's eventual fall that they fit thematically better in Part 2. Also, while the Romans and other cultures fought the Germans in Part 1's time frame, their activities in the Part 2 timeframe were so momentous it's just better to have them in Part 2 instead.

I think we could have up to 3 Germanics in Part 2, and maybe 1 Celto-Germanic (Belgians would be my pick), like how the Macedonians straddle the Greek and Successors "cultures" in Part 1. So, Belgians would have some textures and models from both the Gauls and Germans art sets and probably share some bonuses from each.

there's one thing that i keep forgetting: is Part 2 planned to essentially be an expansion pack or a separate game, e.g., could civs from each one be present in the same random map/scenario as the other?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

there's one thing that i keep forgetting: is Part 2 planned to essentially be an expansion pack or a separate game, e.g., could civs from each one be present in the same random map/scenario as the other?

I would say both :P Technically it will most likely be a completely separate game, but we do intend to include the civs from part one. So if any new features are added new civs should also be able to make use of them, you should be able to play with a part 1 civ against a part 2 civ, etc.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Germanic wars with Rome within time frame of game.

Nice list, but you forgot the campaign before Teutoburg! They even built towns!

No great battles, because the Germans were less populous, less organized and not unified at all ; no siege because there probably wasn't any town to besiege. No glory to win for the Emperor, except pacification.

So, just call it a "Campaign to Germania Magna" or "Campaign for the Weser and the Elbe" or :

Early Occupation of Germania 12 B.C. - 2 B.C.*

(Drusus, Tiberus, Ahenobarbus)

* defeat of the Hermunduri, or 3 A.D., before Tiberus' return to Germania.

This really makes me think we should have at least a Germanic sub-faction for period 1 (one century of intermittent wars).

Druso_in_Germania_per_Wikipedia.JPG

For period 2, imo, the major problem is that there are no town to build: only 100-pop villages, or smaller, and war/migrant parties. We ought to be very imaginative to devise the building and the economy! When barbarian kingdoms are established and for lette peoples, i.e. quite late in the period 2, we have... (Gallo-)Roman towns for them to use or reuse, and traditional Germanic farms.

I really think it is even more a nightmare than as if you would try and implement Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) sedentary peoples : hut, house, farmstead, noble house, forge, shaman's hut, dock?

Edited by Rodmar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice list, but you forgot the campaign before Teutoburg! They even built towns!

No great battles, because the Germans were less populous, less organized and not unified at all ; no siege because there probably wasn't any town to besiege. No glory to win for the Emperor, except pacification.

So, just call it a "Campaign to Germania Magna" or "Campaign for the Weser and the Elbe" or :

Early Occupation of Germania 12 B.C. - 2 B.C.*

(Drusus, Tiberus, Ahenobarbus)

* defeat of the Hermunduri, or 3 A.D., before Tiberus' return to Germania.

This really makes me think we should have at least a Germanic sub-faction for period 1 (one century of intermittent wars).

Druso_in_Germania_per_Wikipedia.JPG

For period 2, imo, the major problem is that there are no town to build: only 100-pop villages, or smaller, and war/migrant parties. We ought to be very imaginative to devise the building and the economy! When barbarian kingdoms are established and for lette peoples, i.e. quite late in the period 2, we have... (Gallo-)Roman towns for them to use or reuse, and traditional Germanic farms.

I really think it is even more a nightmare than as if you would try and implement Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) sedentary peoples : hut, house, farmstead, noble house, forge, shaman's hut, dock?

no, the had build 2 cities "as far we know"

* Haltern

* and other city

this is my evidence

http://youtu.be/NdKUiX61i9g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...