Jump to content

Whats your specs?


Beaver33
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi I thought it sounded like a fun idea to get to know peoples compter specs so here is mine:

Intel P5Q Chipset With Soundcard and HD sound

Intel Pentium Q6600 2.34 Ghz ~2.4

8 Gb DDR2 800Mhz Ram

Nvidia GeForce 9800GT

1.5 Tb Hdd

Windows Vista 64 bit Ultimate edition

Please share...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3R with onboard HD sound

Intel Pentium E6750 OC'd to 3.2Ghz

2 GB DDR2 800Mhz Ram

Nvidia GeForce 8800GT 512MB

320 GB Hdd

Windows XP 32 bit Home edition

Seems to have handled everything on highest or close-to-highest settings so far, including Crysis, but excluding Crysis Warhead(this is annoying as its meant to run better than Crysis).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, it's not that bad at all.

DX 10 brings in nothing new. For example Crysis on XP runs much faster and is often nicer than on Vista.

You have to tweak settings and configs, though.

That suggests, that DX 10 sucks and details are intentionally crippled on DX 9 (as these can be much enhanced by editing configs).

Also, DX 10 was supposed to be much faster because Mode switching was finally introduced to DX (something what OpenGL is having for ages) and thus making (only theoretically) DX somewhat competitive with otherwise faster OpenGL.

Have a look at this page:

http://www.ddworld.cz/index.php?option=com...=1&limitstart=1

Specs:

* Procesor: Core 2 Duo E6600 4BM L2

* Motherboard: Asus P5B Commando

* Graphics card: ASUS 8800GTS 320MB

* RAM: 2x 1GB Kingmax DDR800

* Disk: WD Raptor 10000ot. 37.5GB

* Fortron Epsilon 600W

* Sound: Soundblaster X-Fi Extreme Music.

It is in Czech, but you can see screens there (with Vista, pictures are sometimes slightly blurred - see the screen with two silenced pistols with mountains in background. Namely mountain at top left corner is terribly blurred for Vista) and FPS and compare for yourself that DX 10 is either improperly applied in Crysis or really sucks.

Also see the FPS. XP has never worse results and look.

FPS are rather low everywhere. That was intentional as beauty and details were preferred over framerate.

I wouldn't be surprised if it was same for other games.

And my specs?

Procesor: AMD Phenom II 920 (best balance between performance and cost for quadcore)

4GB RAM

Geforce GTX 275

1TB and 320GB disk

64bit Ubuntu and openSUSE

And also 32bit XP as gameloader (heh, those MS suckers can't even apply PAE properly so I have only 3.25GB RAM available here :) )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...