Jump to content

Faction idea: Byzantine Empire


Belisarivs
 Share

Recommended Posts

1st period

In this period, will Byzantine empire have army trained in Roman fashion (Maurices reforms are yet to come) and units will have Latin names.

Sagitarius - Archer

link

Foederatus - Barbarian Cavalry

link

Excubitorus - Elite heavy infantry, revival of Praetorian Guard

No. 2

Cataphractus - Medium Cavalry

No. 1

Clibanarius - Heavy Cavalry. Also Horse is covered by lamelar armour

link

Scutatus - Spearman with shield

link

Hunnish Mercenary (translation needed) - Elite Horse Archer

link

2nd period

Army changes from Roman to Byzantine.

Sagitarius -> Psilos

No. 4

Foederatus -> Latinikon

No. 2, 3

Excubitorus -> Exkoubitos

No. 2

Cataphractos -> Kataphraktos

No. 1, 2, 3

Clibanarius -> Klibanophoros

link

Scutatus - Skutatos

No. 1 No. 1, 2, 4

Hunnish Mercenary -> Skythikon Misthophoros

link

Arkitos - light cavalry

No. 2

3rd period

Army stays much the same. Heaviest unit disappears.

Latinikon is improved

Klibanophoros disappears

Varangos - Varangian guard

No. 1, 2, 3

Tourkopolos - Christianised or mercenary Turks, horse archer.

No. 2 No. 3

Arkitos -> Trapezitos

No. 1

4th period

Army stays much the same.

Mercenary arquebusier (translation is needed)

No. 3

Vardariot - Medium cavalry armed with bow and sword. Only rider is covered by lamellar armour

No. 1

Trapezitos -> Massagetos - Cuman Mercenary, light cavalry

No. 2

Skutatos -> Byzantine infantry (perhaps "Stratiotus" is appropriate word)

No. 1, 2, 3

Proniar - Heavy Cavalry

No. 1 No. 2

Psilos -> Heavy Psilos - looks weird, greek aquivalent to "heavy" required

No. 3

Byzantine lancers - Medium cavalry, translation needed

No. 1

Balkan mercenary (translation needed) - I decided, to put those light foot mercs from balkan to this one.

No. 2

Abadu, I've lost link to those scans. Cold you give it to me once more, please? I couldn't find many pictures. I may add them later. Comment army composition, post in ideas ...

Edited by Belisarivs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for being away,I was travelling.Happy Easter!(Sorry for being late)

Unfortunally the link doesnt work anymore(The topic was closed,I think),but I have This link with some osprey pics.Im getting some osprey pictures

And the unit list is good,I just think that there are few units in latter periods.Is this "historical"?

Also,Is the hunnish mercenary in the second period correct?

Edited by Abadu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I have Osprey books about Byzantine Empire. And I think, that I have quite a knowledge about Byzantine Empire.

Maurices reforms were so good, that it allowed Byzantine Empire to survive without many modifications. That is why their army doesn't change so much.

Edited by Belisarivs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Emperror Maurice reformed Byzantine army. He is considered to be writer of Strategikon.

He, for example, used unequal numbers of troops in each group, so enemy couldn't easily calculate size of army by calculating banners.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_%28emperor%29

http://navsci.berkeley.edu/ma20/PPT/14%20F...20Byzantine.ppt

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategikon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nice links, especially the powerpoint :) But I think there were a few spelling mistakes (ie ragained)

That is just detail. It wasn't my work, so I can't do anything with it.

I'm seeking someone who can speak Greek, so he can correct any error or finish translation.

Edited by Belisarivs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pehraps the better would be having a fire ship,but I have an osprey book(About early ottoman armies) were there is a picture of a byzantine soldier with a kind of blowpipe(Called tufenk),and it's said,in the book,that the weapon was used to throw greek fire

Here is the picture

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

The Byzantines where as you said just Greeks who took the Mantle of "Eastern Romans" or "New Romans" a little before Rome fell.

Realistically the Byzantines were a culture very different from Romes.

The Religion: Different, The Military: Different (in a lot of ways), Language: Different and Legacy: Very Different.

All in all the Byzantines are so very different. They even called themselves: "Basileia ton Rhomiaon" (or something like that)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Realistically the Byzantines were a culture very different from Romes.

The Religion: Different, The Military: Different (in a lot of ways), Language: Different and Legacy: Very Different.

All in all the Byzantines are so very different. They even called themselves: "Basileia ton Rhomiaon" (or something like that)

I never said those things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...