Jump to content

wolflance

Community Members
  • Posts

    241
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by wolflance

  1. 5) Shield

    Only three variations that I could find:

    v7cDMCm.jpg

    Plain shield, M pattern and Black-on-red pattern.

    Note: Heavy armoured infantry could have larger, almost scutum-sized shield (please refer to the armoured terracotta picture at lower left). Larger shield is unusable by cavalry for obvious reason.

    9PIhZqJ.jpg

    Other variant decoration of the shield. Four dots at the middle of the shield is to fixate the shield handle.

    Basic colour scheme is red (or team colour) on black or black on red. Plain shield is yellow-ish.

    5.1) Shield Size

    5.1.1) Smaller shield

    For

    Basic Infantry Swordsmen

    Advanced Infantry Swordsmen

    Basic Infantry Spearmen

    Advanced Infantry

    Basic Cavalry Swordsmen

    Advanced Cavalry Swordsman

    Elite Cavalry Swordsmen

    xmXqCne.png

    5.1.2) Large shield (Same shape, only larger.)

    For

    Elite Infantry Swordsman

    Elite Infantry Spearman

    rK6nsmU.jpg

    (Note that this is an unfinished home-made replica Qin Dynasty shield modified from a polycarbonate riot shield, the shape and size is similar to Han Dynasty shield, but the decoration is very different.)

    Reference 20: Shield Size Comparison

    aN6OjwT.png

    A Qin Dynasty shield exhumed from the mausoleum has the size of 71cm x 53cm. It is likely smaller than the Han Terracotta shield, but we don't have other reference.

    Another one, from earlier Warring States period, is 92.5cm x 58.5cm, roughly the same size as scutum.

    Compare to:

    Theuros shield (~100cm x 50cm)

    Greek Aspis (~90cm diameter)

    Imperial Roman Scutum (93-106cm x 60-83cm)

    Battersea shield (77cm x 35cm)

  2. 2) Clothing

    As a general rule, red color for melee unit and white color for ranged unit. There are some exceptions, but that is the general trend.

    Beside red and white, there are also black, yellow-orange, teal-green and purple colored cloth.

    *Please refer to Reference 1 and my other thread about reconstructed Han Dynasty clothing.

    3) Thigh

    rmxufv8.png

    Some cavalry (Not all) wear this thing on their thigh.

    4) Armour

    4.1) Pectoral armour for

    Advanced Infantry Swordsman

    Advanced Infantry Spearman

    Advanced Infantry Crossbowman

    Advanced Cavalry Swordsman

    Advanced Cavalry Spearman

    Advanced Cavalry Crossbowman

    B4k3wok.jpg

    Osprey's artwork get the colouring wrong. The Chinese paint their armour with black lacquer, so all of their armour regardless of leather or iron, will appear black.

    Pectoral armour variations:

    I15XJeL.png

    4.2) Sleeveless Armoured Vest

    wQ9F7Avm.jpg

    4.3) Heavy armour for

    Elite Infantry Swordsman

    Elite Infantry Spearman

    Elite Infantry Crossbowman

    Elite Cavalry Swordsman

    Elite Cavalry Spearman

    Elite Cavalry Crossbowman

    PRrwNjo.jpg

    Armour with simple shoulder guard, armour with complete armoured sleeve, and armour with collar guard.

    4.3) Pectoral armour for

    Elite Infantry Bowman

    Elite Horse Archer

    Since archer favours mobility over protection, basic and advanced archer fought unarmoured. Only the most elite archer will be moderately armoured.

    I15XJeL.png

    • Like 2
  3. A quick question: these feathered hats could also be used for the elite infantry archer?

    Supposedly those feathered hat are for more prestigious unit, which means they will likely be mounted.

    Most of these things are excavated in badly decayed states from ancient tomb, so I can't guarantee the owner of said item WILL own a horse. I do found some pre-Han Dynasty artwork depicting cavalry with similar hat though.

    CWwsE7C.png

    • Like 1
  4. Part. 2 Unit Variation

    The problem with Han Dynasty army is that most (or all) of its equipment are mass produced and state-provided. This is generally a good thing as it greatly reduce logistics and cost, and the army will look fairly uniform.

    Nevertheless, for the purpose of 0ad gameplay, it is a bad thing. Every archer and swordsman and spearman will be wearing the same cloth, armour and helmet, which is very dull and hard to tell different unit apart. A (partial) solution is to add unit variation, which I will elaborate base on different part of the body.

    1) Head

    1.1) Head for basic unit

    1.1.1) Unarmoured Head for

    Basic Infantry Swordsman

    Basic Infantry Spearman

    BDHHAeo.jpg2MSF9o0.png

    Bun hair, leather hat and bald guy. The bun hair and leather hat are already in the mod.

    That bald guy is a cóng people (賨人 pronounced 'chong' instead of 'kon'), foreign (barbarian) troops employed by Han army as melee infantry (and cannon fodder).

    Note: I would advice against using hairstyle other than bun hair. To the ancient Chinese people, cutting hair is SERIOUS BUSINESS, i.e. you shouldn't cut your hair, AT ALL. Unless some very specific time, place, and ritual is involved (I think). As a consequences, everyone is featuring that bun hairstyle. Some variant hairstyle can be found on the terracotta figurines, but let's keep it simple.

    1.1.2) Unarmoured Head for

    Basic Infantry Crossbowman

    Jmqhrsk.jpg2MSF9o0.png

    Same with melee infantry, but no bald guy.

    1.1.3) Unarmoured head for

    Basic Cavalry Swordsman

    Basic Cavalry Spearman

    Basic Cavalry Crossbowman

    igZptaM.jpg2MSF9o0.png

    Same as above, but with feathered hat.

    1.2) Head for advanced unit

    1.2.1) Head for

    Advanced Infantry Swordsman

    Advanced Infantry Spearman

    Advanced Infantry Crossbowman

    79rpHg3.jpg

    iksRWwY.jpg

    Leather hat, helmet with exposed bun hair, and feathered helmet.

    Note: Three helmets in the middle are just different perspective of the same helmet.

    1.2.2) Head for

    Advanced Cavalry Swordsman

    Advanced Cavalry Spearman

    Advanced Cavalry Crossbowman

    MA0vkLv.jpg

    iksRWwY.jpg

    Same as above, but add feathered hat.

    1.3) Head for elite unit

    1.3.1) Head for

    Elite Infantry Swordsman

    Elite Infantry Spearman

    Elite Cavalry Swordsman

    Elite Cavalry Spearman

    91flvd8.jpg

    iksRWwY.jpg

    Different types of helmet.

    I think the full helmet (and large shield) actually start to appear during mid-Western Han and gradually replaced lighter equipment...but I am not entirely certain about that.

    1.3.2) Head for

    Elite Infantry Crossbowman

    Elite Cavalry Crossbowman

    c4PwM29.jpg

    iksRWwY.jpg

    Full helmet blocks peripheral vision, which is bad for ranged unit.

    1.4) Head for bow unit.

    Since heavy armour could potentially impede movement, archers tend to be lightly armoured. There are exceptions to this rule (such as heavy armoured samurai and cataphract), but I think Han Chinese generally favours mobility on their bowmen and horse archers.

    1.4.1) Head for

    Basic Infantry Bowman

    Basic Horse Archer

    jgTwLk7.png2MSF9o0.png

    1.4.2) Head for

    Advanced Infantry Bowman

    Elite Infantry Bowman

    eR0SbG5.png

    1.4.3) Head for

    Advanced Horse Archer

    Elite Horse Archer

    ybNBK12.png

    Scrapped

    WGj17iG.png

    This is found in a Xianbei tomb during the early Eastern Han period.

    Update: Horse

    *Basic horse has no decorations.

    Also, don't forget the design of saddle cloth too.

    Advanced Horse

    oNwWnMH.jpg

    Elite Horse

    jBezRaH.jpg

    Reference 20: Han Dynasty Horse Terracotta

    iYkiKRP.jpg
    • Like 2
  5. 7) Aesthetic

    This is probably the only part I will touch about building and architecture, because I am not very knowledgeable in it. I might come back after I expanded my knowledge on this area though.

    7.1) Dragon banner

    IWUchLL.png

    This kind of artwork is way too modern for Han Dynasty (I am guessing this is a Qing Dynasty artwork). Han Dynasty art tend to be very primitive, tribal-like, and utilitarian.

    Reference 16: Han Dynasty Dragon Artwork

    c5VAva0.jpg

    It has wing! :thumbsup:

    7.2) Paper Lantern

    qgpd0v5.png

    TBH, I am not even sure paper lantern existed back then. Even if it did, it wouldn't look like this.

    7.3) Water Well

    WM30zHC.png

    Could refer to the pottery models for a better design.

    Reference 17: Han Dynasty Pottery Well

    Kd3BQVi.jpg

    F1qjx9X.jpg

    7.4) Door

    GBHkATD.png

    AFAIK all doors on Han Dynasty buildings are rectangular. No arched door.

    Speaking of which, that sign above this door read "大雄宝殿", which is the main hall of Shaolin Temple (which didn't existed yet). That font also haven't been invented.

    7.5) Barrack

    8d6gq27.png

    While current model is good, I would like to suggest an alternate layout:

    Reference 18: Some kind of barrack

    H18lJ4v.jpg

    Note: The "議事廳" in this picture means 'conference hall'. This is a modern reproduction building after all. Probably has some air conditioner hidden somewhere.

    7.6) Bixie

    VlgHuRm.png

    This design is again too advanced for Han Dynasty.

    Reference 19: Han Dynasty bixie statue

    aB16kUi.jpg
    • Like 1
  6. 6) Siege engine

    Y1QlCgH.png

    We have an entire thread dedicated to Han Dynasty siege warfare already, so I wouldn't need to say much.

    That being said, those spears from the siege tower need to be fixed. Please refer to section 2). I actually prefer the more primitive Jing Lan over the Lv Gong Che, which was invented just before the fall of Yuan Dynasty.

    I would like to suggest name change:

    • Siege Crossbow: "shou she nu (手射弩)" to "nǔ chē (弩车)" OR "lián nǔ chē (连弩车)" OR “qiáng nǔ chē (强弩车)”.
    • Siege Tower: "lin chong lv gong che (临冲吕公车)" to "lín chē (临车)" OR "lóng chē (隆车)"

    Note: A lián nǔ in Han Dynasty context refers not to repeating crossbow but "siege crossbow that shoots rope-attached bolt". Think modern whaling harpoon cannon.

    6.1) Other recorded siege weapons

    (I simply list it here, it is up to the modders to decide which to use, or not using at all. Five different siege weapons is too redundant for one faction anyway.)

    Battering ram "chong che (冲车)"

    Armoured Carroballista "Wu Gang Qiang Nu Che (武刚强弩车)"

    Three Kingdoms Period Stone-thrower "Pi Li Che (霹雳车)"

    Three Kingdoms Period Siege Tower "Jing Lan (井阑)"

    • Like 1
  7. If the technology existed

    it WAS used, regardless of how often.

    Not necessary true. Technology can become lost, phased out because it is incompatible with the current method of warfare, mothballed for economic or other reasons, or evolve into/replaced by another, better technology.

    For example, ge halberd evolved into ji halberd, iron replaced bronze, roman gladius being superseded by spatha, and lorica segmentata being phased out after 3rd century.

    Han Dynasty likely phased out stone-throwers because their main adversary was nomadic Xiongnu. Heavy siege equipment will slow down the army, making them vulnerable to ambush and raids, there isn't many trees lying in the desert and grasslands to build one on the spot, Xiongnu being nomadic meaning very few permanent settlements for them to lay siege, and in the rare instance when the Han army DID lay siege on Xiongnu, they burned everything down and took the fortified city in two days with overwhelming numbers, without resorting to siege engine.

    Towards the end of Han Dynasty (Three Kingdoms period), the Chinese were warring among themselves again, and siege warfare become necessary once more. Thus the resurgence of stone-thrower and other siege engine.

  8. 248.jpg?size=100pw&limit=35p&cache=no&ta

    I stumbled upon this drawing of a Three Kingdoms period siege tower called Jing Lan (井阑) which I think is drawn by some Japanese .

    This design is more primitive and less effective than the hide-covered lv gong che 吕公车, but then again it is much closer to the timeframe of this mod (Current siege tower is from Ming Dynasty after all).

    The only description of this weapon is that it is used by Zhuge Liang, its height and its purpose: A several hundred chi (尺) siege tower use to shoot over fortified wall (or defenders on said wall). No mentions of any hide covering, no mentions of multiple floor either.

    The name "Jing Lan" suggests this weapon is similar in shape to a wood-lined water well, so I deduce the Japanese interpretation is feasible.

    hB5MLRr.png

    The Japanese interpret Chong Che (冲车) not as battering rams, but another type of siege tower. It is very very confusing :bangin: .

  9. With regards to references, I think we should not rely on Red Cliff too much because it is essentially a Hollywood anachronism of events. Red Cliff is made for entertainment, not for authenticity. So let's try to find better sources and use Red Cliff only as a discussion point.

    The Red Cliff is very accurate on historical accuracy as far as Chinese movie goes. There are some inaccuracy and anachronism (They use Western Han period clothing while the timeline is set in late Eastern Han/Three Kingdoms, but that is because Eastern Han archaeological finds are way too scarce to reconstruct anything concrete).

    We can disregard the fancy costume/armour on named characters, those giant shields and round shields from the first movie, outdated or anachronistic weapons like ge (戈) ,Guandao and that horse-drawn chain...thing, serious lack of crossbows, and crazy martial art moves. Other than that, it is actually quite good in the costume department.

    • Like 2
  10. 5) Naval Unit

    I am not really knowledgeable in naval history either, but I really wish I could draw some concept of Han warship (if I could draw, that is).

    5.1) Rudder

    fJ84fwI.png

    Could use a rudder here :dirol:

    Also, second 'floor' on this ship seems closer to first floor than third floor, for some reason.

    Reference 11: Chinese Rudder

    G9UwMHn.jpg

    5.2) Chinese Sail

    fXY7pPx.png

    Chinese sail should be segmented on both side. (This is just very minor nitpicking)

    EDIT: I might be wrong on this one. Need more reference to be sure.

    EDIT 2: I was wrong. Current sail design is correct.

    Reference 12: Korean ships and sail

    0vy0yAb.jpg

    Korean panokseon (ship on the right) is a derivative design of the Chinese Tower ship.

    Reference 13: Modern junk ship and sail

    aeY4aTh.jpg

    tXy9kjP.jpg

    5.3) Han Dynasty Warship Timeline (I think I already mentioned this somewhere else, but can't recall where):

    Western Han: Tower ship (楼船) and Ge Chuan (戈船)

    Eastern Han: Tower ship, Mao Tu (冒突) and Lu Nao (露挠)

    Three Kingdoms: Tower ship, Dou Jian (斗舰) and Meng Chong (艨冲). Also Zou Ge (走舸) and fire ship.

    • The Ge Chuan (戈船) is basically a medium warship/troop transport. The only defining feature of this ship is lots of spears and halberds (probably arranged uptight) on the deck.
    • Mao Tu (冒突) and Lu Nao (露挠) can be interpreted as another name for Meng Chong/Covered Swooper (艨冲). Mao Tu (冒突) is described as an assault ship, while Lu Nao (露挠) is described as completely covered, with only oars visible from the outside.
    • Zou Ge (走舸) is a smallish boat, probably around the size of a sampan.

    Depending on time period, I think we *might* need to pick which warship (name) to use carefully.

    Reference 14: Turnbull's interpretation of Three Kingdoms period warships

    m3onZbj.png

    I think the tower ship and (un)covered swooper is influenced by Japanese interpretation, especially from some KOEI's game. Other ships at the bottom are based on excavated pottery models. That Fire ship is lifted directly from Song Dynasty drawings.

    I don't really like his interpretation though. Such monstrosity. They are paddling the ship instead of oaring it!

    5.4) Fishing boat

    xBigthn.png

    (suggestion only) I know there are some modern Chinese fisherman still fish like this, but I want at least a sampan :down:

    Wooden box could be replaced with a (round) bamboo basket.

    Also, the fisherman should wear no boots/shoes.

    5.5) Merchant boat

    mLtSxsj.png

    No sail and flag. Sailor (should be generally )standing on the back of the ship to man the rudder-oar . Again, shouldn't wear shoes.

    Reference 15 Han brick artworks and pottery boats.

    3naRSzr.jpgTkL9Y4dm.jpg

    rLRhmCmm.jpgkdIE84jm.jpg

    Some of the many Han period pottery boats can be useful reference.

    • Like 1
  11. 4) Heroes and Champion

    UFjJCJI.png

    4.1) Liu Bang

    I really like Liu Bang's design. Liu Bang had a legend that associate him with sword (he killed a snake to mark the start of rebellion against Qin Dynasty. Maybe he REALLY hated snake :P). The bronze sword complement him nicely, as Liu Bang predates Han Dynasty itself. Liu Bang often boasted he "won the Tianxia on horseback", so a horse is fitting.

    For clothing, as a Emperor Liu Bang would had been wearing an imperial gown called jun xuan (袀玄), which is a black gown. Current clothing is only knee-length, too short to be considered a proper gown.

    For some reason Liu Bang is trained from the farmstead, but I believe this is just temporary.

    Proposed Hero Ability:

    Economic aura: Liu Bang is not really a military guy but a good politician. His presence increase resource collecting speed (and/or yield).

    Healing boost aura: Friendly Confucian scholar heals better.

    Bribe: Active ability, paying certain amount of resource to force surrounding enemy unit to stop attacking for a while (and forcing retreat - if that sort of thing is possible to code). Enemy unit under the effect of bribing will be treated as neutral by your faction and your allies.

    To prevent abuse, this ability can only be used in friendly territory.

    Reference 8: Western Han Jun Xuan design

    0jWIvbq.jpgPlain black, no decoration. That 'crown' is part of the set too.

    More ornate emperor gown probably appeared after Liu Bang's death.

    Reference 9: Statue of a really angry Liu Bang chopping down a snake.

    cV6rrt3.gif

    4.2) Han Xin

    Current model is way too generic for a celebrated legend like Han Xin.

    Han Xin had the reputation of always carry a sword around to the point of being humiliated (because he never actually use it), I suggest an eye candy sheathed sword for the 3D model :yes3: . He worked as a guard / halberd bearer for Xiang Yu for a while before defecting to Liu Bang. There's also a mythical legend about him using a spear to stab the ground to find fresh water.

    Personally I would imagine this hero as a heavily armoured cavalry lancer, as he is famous for his lightning fast strike, raid and ambush, deceptions, and generally high mobility warfare. As Han Xin also predates Han Dynasty, he could use earlier Qin Dynasty equipment as well.

    Proposed Hero Ability:

    Stealth aura: Passive aura that hides surrounding friendly unit from enemy mini-map.

    Death wish aura: Surrounding friendly unit gradually increase their damage and attacking speed the more damage they take. (i.e. 100% increase in DPS at 50% health, 200% increase at 10% health, etc. Subject to balancing). Does not affect Han Xin himself and siege engine / ship / tower / garrisons.

    *If building capturing is implemented into the game, he would get a 'capturing aura' as well.

    Reference 10: Some character (wearing sensible armour) from the movie Red Cliff

    WNRauVum.jpg

    A heroic cloak would be mighty fine :dirol:.

    4.3) Yet to be implemented Third Hero

    Current design document indicates that third hero would be Wei Qing. Wei Qing is a cavalry hero, but most famous for his wagon fort tactic. He certainly did not use repeating crossbow though, that would be Li Ling.

    Proposed Hero Ability (for Wei Qing):

    Wu Gang Che: Active ability that train a bunch of slow moving, garrisonable cart.

    In term of gameplay, I imagine Liu Bang as Defensive/Economic/Booming hero, Han Xin as Offensive/Ambush/Decisive Strike hero, while Wei Qing as Steady Push/Siege/Staying Power hero.

    4.4) Champion Unit

    Since there is none yet, may I suggest:

    • Cavalry Lancer (Yu Lin Guard)
    • Horse Archer (Bow) (Hu Ben Guard)
    • Two-handed Swordsman Infantry
    • Hybrid Melee-Crossbow Infantry - May be hard to implement, judging from the discussion about dual-role unit like Theurophoroi.

    *There's a WIP elite Han archer model already, I hope modify it to become a cavalry unit won't be too complicated...

    • Like 1
  12. 3) Weapon

    3.1) Anachronistic Halberd Fixed. Anachronistic halberd is longer used in this mod.

    Spoiler

    deFZ4MQ.png
    This halberd does not exist during Han period, so it need to be removed. Same goes for some of the halberds poking out of that AWESOME siege tower.


    3.2) Halberd again Partially fixed. Still found on siege tower.
     

    Spoiler

    TyllwjK.png

    3.3) Halberd again Still found on siege tower.

    Spoiler

    PwGePlNl.png
    The 'spearhead' part of the halberd need to be more visible. This should be a ji (戟)and not a ge (戈). Also, there's only one 'dagger-axe' protrudes from one side of the shaft (read: not on BOTH sides). He is also holding the weapon wrongly, as the 'dagger-axe' part of this halberd should point to the other direction.

    Reference 4: Han Dynasty Ji halberd

    Spoiler

    sQkcDET.jpg

    Reference 5: Correct way of handling a halberd ;)

    Spoiler

    85DeNZI.jpg
    Check the right horseman.


    3.3) Tassel on spear Fixed.

    Spoiler

     

    2DHLC0T.png
    I don't believe tassel (that red brush thingy below the spearhead) existed back then. AFAIK earliest records are from Tang Dynasty.

     

    (Chinese did use some sort of tassel during Eastern Han though.)

     

    3.4) Spear

    sjEiBr1.png

    Current spearhead is rhomboid-shaped. Could use a better one, but this is (and should be) REALLY low priority because every unit in the game features the same spearhead.

    Reference 6: Some Han Dynasty spearheads

    Spoiler


    4s0wLYS.jpg

    3.5) Jian, Double-edged Sword Fixed. Jians are no longer used by swordsman and cavalry swordsman units.
    WAZof6g.png
    Double-edged swords or Jian should be reserved for officer and Hero unit only. Bronze weapon was being phased out as well, especially bronze Jian.

    In short, all long iron Jian should be removed. Shorter bronze Jian is still ok in extremely limited numbers (even that is stretching).

    3.6) Dao, single-edged sword. Partially fixed, Daos still quite long.

    B7xdJ8B.png

    You can easily tell by the grip that these swords are designed for two handed use. Could use a shorter version. Two handed swords (both Daos and Jians) could be used by specialist troop a.l.a. Britons.

    All swords are too broad, the blade of a Han Dynasty sword is generally not broader than its grip.

    (Think ninja sword without tsuba but with a ring pommel, and you basically get a Han Dao)

    Both iron and bronze Daos were used (less bronze obviously).

    Reference 7: Different Han Dynasty Weapons

    Spoiler

    PWHZMIm.jpg

    (Top to bottom) Ji Halberd, Mao spear, Jian double-edged sword (hand guard and pommel missing), Huanshou Dao single-edged sword, and Yue Ji halberd (axe + spearhead)

    • Like 1
  13. I have to say I am very impressed by the latest release 17. Certainly it is MUCH closer to completion than version 16, as Chinese faction finally has most faction buildings completed/near completion. I am especially impressed with the unit roaster, as it pretty much covers everything Han Dynasty military has to over.

    I open this thread to voice out my suggestion and opinions on various Chinese units. I am not a gameplay-and-balancing type of guy, but very much into aesthetics and historical accuracy. Also, my knowledge on architecture is limited, so I would not comment on the buildings, at least at the moment.

    Part 1. Historical Inaccuracy

    1) Clothing

    Spoiler

    vKx0yvv.png

    The circled parts of the clothing probably didn't exists.

    2) Armour

    2.1) Light Armour for archers (elite) and sword cavalry (advanced) Fixed. No longer found in the mod.

    Spoiler

    60QMvOW.png

    I had never seen these...uh, pectoral breastplate, on any Han Dynasty terracotta before. I suggest swap the armour of spearman (basic) here.

    I don't think that kind of helmet existed during Han Dynasty, and I am not sure about the champron either.

    2.2) Medium Armour for Spearman (Advanced)

    Spoiler

     

    U1prsfB.png

    Never seen this before either, should be removed.

     

    2.3) Heavy Armour

    Spoiler

     

    lOfKIHq.png

    I liked both. I would prefer the outline of the left armour colored red (or made into team color). Both armours could be darker (as in pitch black, Chinese put black lacquer on their armour).

     

    2.3.1) Proposed texture fix for heavy armour

    Spoiler

     

    MPXjQEQ.jpg

    I used a bit of photoshop :artist:

     

    2.4) Helmets Fixed. No longer found in the mod.

    Spoiler

     

    yNboY6V.png

    Left helmet is anachronism, right helmet could be modified shorter and painted black. Put feather too if possible.

     

    Reference 1: Armour for a Han Crossbowman (Advance and Elite)

    Spoiler

    amErclk.jpgZC9u5r6.jpg

    This outfit is applicable for every other Han unit (Expect maybe bowmen and horse bowmen).

    Reference 2a: Han Dynasty Crossbow Quiver

    Spoiler

    s3kbkCu.jpg

    9xxRGpv.jpgPSxN5am.jpg8E4Tyhy.jpg

    Exhumed crossbow quiver from Ma Wang Dui.

    sMagLOZ.jpg

    Han painted brick showing a crossbowman spanning his crossbow. Arrows can be seen fan out from his back.

    zdVG2cG.jpg

    Han Dynasty terracotta soldier with a crossbow quiver.

    Crossbow quiver is box-shaped, usually worn on the back.

    Reference 2b Han Dynasty bow and quiver

    Spoiler

    jw9ra6I.jpg

    Han bow, bow bag, and quiver exhumed from the Niya site. Note that the bow is stringed wrongly.

    Arrow quiver is usually worn on right hip.

    2.4) Shield on swordsman (or lack thereof). Fixed. All sword unit has shield now.

    Spoiler

     

    SUtsMSw.png

    Swordsman without shield is...weird. They should always come with a shield, instead of given shield when promoted. (Historically sword and shield are always mentioned side-by-side in period military treatises, one arsenal record even has exactly the same number of swords and shields, implying they were indeed used together)

    (Can't imagine a Legionary goes to war without his scutum either)

    Reference 3: Han period painting depicting sword-and-shield cavalry

    Spoiler

    8QqNrEH.jpg

     

    2.5) Speaking of shield...Partially Fixed. Shield still found on barrack.

    Spoiler

     

    bK8rox1.png

    rBytLS9.png

    I don't recall seeing this type of pentagonal shield in use during Han Dynasty either (most are gourd-shaped). I hope someone could prove me wrong though, because I kinda like the design.

     

    • Like 1
  14. For a RTS about historical, ancient warfare, making things as historically accurate as feasible is a always good. So I couldn't understand why "Hellenic skirmisher look different than Persian skirmisher" is a bad thing, even if they serve the same function in their respective factions.

    Some civs have access to special upgrade for their unit, so making every unit from every factions look the same might actually confuse the player even more. (i.e. OMG how can this skirmisher throwing flaming javelins but mine couldn't ????!! )

    I heard ranged units are currently OP, and making projectile less accurate could be a possible way to fix that (also more realism yay!). It could complicate the balancing process though, although personally I am not against micro-ing fast units to outrun arrows.

    • Like 1
  15. Superbly done!

    The leather helmet can be transplanted from melee infantry (i think), but those long feathers....

    Speaking of which, the reconstructor Jing Ming call this outfit hǔ bēn (虎贲), which is one of the Palace Guard unit during late Western Han Dynasty (They are simply renamed Qi Men guard). That's why I said before they *could* be mounted.

  16. snip

    When I mention "auto weapon switching” for ranged unit, I was actually thinking along the lines of Starcraft 2's Hydralisk, same attack, different (melee) animations. For err, flavour and aesthetics, I guess. (They still die like flies when engaging any dedicated melee unit)

    For Ekdromoi I meant sword/spear switching, if for some reason Hellenes REALLY need a swordsman unit. Spear-all-the-way is more historical though.

  17. Too many 'toggle' ability in an RTS game with masses of troops is extremely hard to balance indeed (not to mention micro-heavy).

    But I think an autocast, cooldown-based "pilum salvo" ability can still work.

    IMO weapon switching should be automated and limited to ranged unit that is forced into melee. (With rare exception for dual-role unit like Ekdromos, when inside/outside a hoplite formation)

    EDIT

    Some "truly versatile" unit, like Thureophoroi (or maiden guard), should default to ranged unit, auto-switch weapon only when engaged in melee AND/OR ordered to form into formation (depend on how said unit was historically used).

  18. I would say the guy who made these is certainly one of the more respected (read: accurate) reconstructor in China (IMHO). Obviously there are some blanks that need to be filled with guesswork and approximates, but being a mainland Chinese he does has more access to museum and other first hand information than the rest of us.

    (And I really admire his dedication in reconstructing the Xiongnu and other culture deemed 'barbaric' by ancient Chinese. )

×
×
  • Create New...