Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ykkrosh hasn't written patch for 0AD for few years now :) Also wraitii seems to be busy with Pathfinder right now but he still does reviews which is nice :) Dont you have a lot on your plate @vladislavbelov ? :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm planning to try and review this, in general it's better to have unreviewed patches than no patches at all of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, stanislas69 said:

Dont you have a lot on your plate @vladislavbelov ? :)

Why? I'm working mostly on Atlas, Graphics, GUI and Renderer components. It's not so much I think :)

Also my CS works are about a procedurally generated content and big landscape rendering.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, vladislavbelov said:

Why? I'm working mostly on Atlas, Graphics, GUI and Renderer components. It's not so much I think

Can I have an actor viewer that doesn't take ages to load ?

Can we have brushes to paint trees or other objects ?

 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, stanislas69 said:

Can I have an actor viewer that doesn't take ages to load ?

Can we have brushes to paint trees or other objects ?

Yes, you can :)

How long is it loading for you?

The brush seems not hard to implement. Let's see after the FF.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

About ten seconds while it was kinda instant before this release. There is a ticket about it. The brush too.

Also it's normal but it takes a big time to load all the units in delenda est. ;)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@vladislavbelov can we some button to group object in-atlas without doing the grouping templates manually? Can we save those grouped objects?
Can we have an add units in other animation than idle? Sometimes mappers (not-me) make huge maps with a lot of objects, running the game becomes virtually impossible and a sure kaput, thus, whenever the mapper wants to make a little showcase of the map it has to cross-fingers and move/order units slowly to give the feel they are moving or doing something. So, what i ask, is: Can we have a units placer while on a different animation stance without having to simulate the map? 

Can we have a favorite list of objects? Or some sort of panel that indicates which objects are placed? Perhaps even a counter could fit well too 

Can we have terrain brushes with more settings and variations? Like triangles, polygons where we can add more axis 

Is it possible to reduce the size of the squares on the grid? Don't know if the size of each square it's used by the path-finder, but i think if each square were half the size or lesser, terrain brushes or paint brushes could allow to more or better modifications of the map, or at least it could give a smoother transition between different paint textures.
Sorry don't know how to explain this very well, neither i can't make an example using atlas, neither i don't know the implications of the size of each square in the grid, don't know if it is performance or path-finder... 
 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you guys are misunderstanding what "soft shadows" means. In the context of graphics, 'soft shadows' means 'variable penumbra shadows'. In real life the size of a shadow's penumbra increases based on the size of the light and the distance between the shadow caster and the shadow receiver.

So for example a tall tree casts a blurrier shadow than a short one:

screenshot0055.thumb.png.f2013f21d88cf2d6a34167e22abafb43.png

Or a giraffe's head casts a blurrier shadow than its legs do:

screenshot0056.thumb.png.1a57e5a0383ebca8a145ee39f296c115.png

And you can see here how the shadow smoothly becomes blurrier from the base of the tower to its top:

screenshot0057.thumb.png.694c1f902195cec8339c7dbe675b48f1.png

The shadows are still sharp, but they look dramatically more realistic in terms of creating the impression of distance.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, aeonios said:

The shadows are still sharp, but they look dramatically more realistic in terms of creating the impression of distance.

Those do look awesome and more realistic. Thank you for clarifying. Your earlier screenshots did not convey this effect effectively, but these create a nice affect. Maybe I think it blurs slightly too much, but I'm nitpicking at this point. ;)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, wowgetoffyourcellphone said:

Those do look awesome and more realistic. Thank you for clarifying. Your earlier screenshots did not convey this effect effectively, but these create a nice affect. Maybe I think it blurs slightly too much, but I'm nitpicking at this point. ;)

Meh, it's difficult to get something that works well in all situations, but imo it's better to have too much than too little. Too little and unit shadows and towers don't get any penumbra at all.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, aeonios said:

Meh, it's difficult to get something that works well in all situations, but imo it's better to have too much than too little. Too little and unit shadows and towers don't get any penumbra at all.

I think the reason why we need it - increasing realism of the game picture. We don't add effects for effects. If you want to make it very noticeable, you can add it for any graphic benchmark. Currently penumbra effect is too blurry in comparison with real life IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree it looks a little too blurry perhaps, but it'd be nice as a setting. It'd be nice to have a settable "low" and "high", to better simulate cloudier weather indeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright, I reduced the blur scaling to 1.0. Any less than that would defeat the purpose, but 1.0 seems to work fine as far as I can tell. As they say, the perfect is the enemy of the good.

Mapgen turned out to be somewhat more involved than I expected, but nonetheless I've gotten some excellent results. I was intending to work on ardennes forest but ended up modifying the alpine valley generator to produce maps in the style of the handcrafted version. I needed the mountain range generator for ardennes anyway and it ended up producing some really stunning maps with really interesting divisions of space.

screenshot0006.thumb.png.3dda5acf5940a280bcb8b255b2da077b.pngscreenshot0007.thumb.png.b860024bc2ec3df4e1d1b3eb48eeb2f6.pngscreenshot0008.thumb.png.a1aaa0840a0a1a873ba5a986833f0959.png

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, aeonios said:

Alright, I reduced the blur scaling to 1.0. Any less than that would defeat the purpose, but 1.0 seems to work fine as far as I can tell. As they say, the perfect is the enemy of the good.

Mapgen turned out to be somewhat more involved than I expected, but nonetheless I've gotten some excellent results. I was intending to work on ardennes forest but ended up modifying the alpine valley generator to produce maps in the style of the handcrafted version. I needed the mountain range generator for ardennes anyway and it ended up producing some really stunning maps with really interesting divisions of space.

screenshot0006.thumb.png.3dda5acf5940a280bcb8b255b2da077b.pngscreenshot0007.thumb.png.b860024bc2ec3df4e1d1b3eb48eeb2f6.pngscreenshot0008.thumb.png.a1aaa0840a0a1a873ba5a986833f0959.png

That looks nice. The old alpine valley was one of the ugliest maps we have...

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×