PhyZik 27 Report post Posted August 20, 2017 (edited) 4vs4 on Rivers, successful skirm cav counters, bolts, a lot of tactics and teamplay. http://imgur.com/a/tEBYQ 2017-08-20_0004.rar Edited August 20, 2017 by PhyZik 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
temple 92 Report post Posted August 20, 2017 (Tagged everyone except temple, hmm.) I had bad tactics and strategy throughout. I should've remembered how important trade is on these closed maps. The lighthouse is nice. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
elexis 2,103 Report post Posted August 20, 2017 (Playernames shouldn't be tags btw) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Feldfeld 111 Report post Posted August 20, 2017 13 minutes ago, elexis said: (Playernames shouldn't be tags btw) It seemed odd to me too, but it could prove useful is some want to search replay of a specific player without clicking on all thread (provided there's a lot of replays posted, too). But map name and number of players are more useful informations. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhyZik 27 Report post Posted August 20, 2017 1 hour ago, temple said: (Tagged everyone except temple, hmm.) Haha, sorry, I forgot you. Corrected now. 50 minutes ago, elexis said: (Playernames shouldn't be tags btw) Why not? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
elexis 2,103 Report post Posted August 20, 2017 I was looking for the names in the summary, as every other replay report in the last releases and this release had the names there. One can search for playernames in the a22 replay subforum too. Tag them if you want, but notice the forum search won't bring this post up when someone searches for Achelao for example. So maybe add names to both parts. Guess we should also add this topic to the a22 subforum, pin it and add the playername recommendation. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
serveurix 84 Report post Posted November 26, 2017 Please re-upload this one in a non-rar format Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stanislas69 4,241 Report post Posted November 26, 2017 @serveurix What's wrong with rar format ? (Other than it being proprietary) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
serveurix 84 Report post Posted November 26, 2017 (edited) "proprietary" doesn't make sense for a format. A format is either "open" (can be implemented by anyone) or "closed" (cannot). rar is the latter. If you want to share with users of a specific program or a list of specific programs, use a closed format, if you want to share with everyone, use an open format. ( So, you're right, I wasn't specific enough, archives should be uploaded in an open format, not just non-rar). Edited November 26, 2017 by serveurix 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stanislas69 4,241 Report post Posted November 26, 2017 @serveurix Right, sorry for the term misuse Here you go. 2017-08-20_0004.7z 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
serveurix 84 Report post Posted November 26, 2017 (edited) thank you for that, but don't do the work that OPs should do, or they will never learn Edited November 26, 2017 by serveurix formulating 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tuk0z 15 Report post Posted November 28, 2017 Specificaly, some replays I cannot... replay them as `unrar-free` (the only version of the closed sources app' a Linux user have access to) produces empty folders from them. All these are *.RAR. So to illustrate what serveurix just said Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
