Jump to content


Community Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Pablinski2

  1. 14 hours ago, Stan` said:

    @Pablinski2 Any news?

    I'm just back, I've been doing some moving stuff since my 3D course is going on again, so I'll be off for a few months maybe but when I come back I'll come wiser, I'll be ready to do rigging and animation, I think that's pretty necessary rn, so I hope it's not needed in the future (that would mean progress is going on) but if needed I'll be here, so I guess I'll be off for a time. See you all soon and thanks for the opportunitty you gave me :D

    I'll swing by the forums when I have a little spare time (just like rn)

    Thx for everything and I'll be back :D

    • Like 3
  2. On 5/15/2020 at 8:04 AM, Stan` said:

    Well it clearly has too many polygons 930000 if you read the bottom right corner but it looks good. Id' like to know what license it is under though.

    Actually there are 3 colossus there, maybe that's why there are too many faces

  3. On 5/15/2020 at 8:04 AM, Stan` said:

    Well it clearly has too many polygons 930000 if you read the bottom right corner but it looks good. Id' like to know what license it is under though.

    Maybe some retopology to reduce polygons? I might be wrong but I think that's sculpture so it must be triangulated, and if at some point we want to animate the colossus it would be better to have quads. Just saying.

  4. On 5/11/2020 at 4:49 AM, marius4 said:



    I'm already in the task of doing it, I just need the opinion that I should carry in my left hand and what would be the round cotagonal pedestal, or retangular.

    It would maybe be cool that there were like 2 or 3 depictions of the colossus due to the fact that we don't know for sure how the colossus was, and you could either build the one you liked the most (in case it was buildable) or randomly selected. In case it was a prop of some campaign, each time there was a different depiction of the colossus.

    A lo mejor estaría bien que hubiese 2 o 3 representaciones del coloso, dado que no sabemos exactamente cómo fue, y que pudieses o escoger cuál construir (en el caso en que sea construible) o que se construyese una aleatoria. En el caso de que fuese un prop en un mapa de campaña, que cada vez apareciese una representación del coloso.

  5. On 5/9/2020 at 9:21 PM, Stan` said:

    There is plenty of tasks I can give you both for the game and mods :)

    As long as it is mainly modeling, whatever is needed!


    18 hours ago, Stan` said:

    @Pablinski2 btw were those to be committed, under what name do you wish to be credited, just the nickname, or both your real name and nick?

    Real an nick name plz. Pablo Pozo Pablinski2. You got the full mod including the gate and its armature? Do you want to include the round tower @Nescio asked for? I can do a few models and you choose :D.

    I've been off these days, sorry :(

  6. A friend of mine who is a historian specialized in militar history and fellow player of this game, and me, we want to create a new distance unit for the Roman civilization because Roman have only 2 distance human units (velites and italic cavalry) in comparison to the rest of the civilizations that have at least 3 human distance units.

    So we propose the Manuballistas.

    We could take care of the documentation and the 3D modelling (ofc with the feedback and the approval of the community)

    This unit was used from the year 100 A.C to the 500 A.C by the Roman Empire in some great campaings such as the Danubian/Dacian Campaign by Trajan Emperor.

    This weapon is the upgrade of the greek "gastraphete" both in technology and power. The main troops carrying this weapon were auxiliary troops marching aside the Scorpions (light ballista, already implemented in the game). This was a very effective weapon because of its piercing power against shields and armours, it was also very economic due to the low price of the process of manufacturing its ammunition (wood darts with iron tip) It could also shoot  3-4cm of diameter metal balls.

    The body armor soldiers carrying this weapon used was the Lorica Hamata (they could use the Lorica Segmentata, but the Hamata was mainly used because it was more comfortable).

    It took just a little of training for a solier to almost master this weapon, making him as dangerous as an experimented archer who has been training for years. This weapon was designe by Heor from Alejandria.

    We also found this book, but it is in German and we couldn't find any translation, so if anyone who speaks German wants to do a little research... I'll just leave it here Die frühkaiserzeitliche Manuballista aus Xanten-Wardt (Xantener Berichte) it is supossed to talk about this specific weapon so it could be a very good source.










  7. 3 minutes ago, Stan` said:

    Like I said above just remove the .000 and .001 :)

    Okay, so now i export both armature and mesh together, name it anyway (palisade_gate_closed) and put the collada in its place and the xml in its place, What do I need toput in the xml, ¿palisade_gate_closed?

  8. 3 minutes ago, Stan` said:

    If you didn't change it you shouldn't need to. I guess the names being messed up is the reason ,:)

    The how should I name the mesh and how shoould I name the armature?? xD I'm sorry I thought that wouldn't be a problem :(

  9. I didn't change the armature btw, or at least, I don't remember to have done it xd

    PS: Just done the proccess of exporting to collada again right from the start and nope, I didn't changed the armature and the error keeps on being Line 393 "Recognised sekeleton structure"

  10. 49 minutes ago, Stan` said:

    If you didn't try to rename palisade_gate_towers.001 to palisade_gate_towers

    and gate.000 to gate

    So I understand that one is the mesh and the other the armature, But how do I do the .xml file for the armature? I must export the armature and the mesh separately into .dae files right?

  11. 8 minutes ago, Stan` said:

    That's something else :)  But yes you should. A dangling vertex is a vertex no connected to a face.

    Okay, now the error is Line 570 "mesh has single set of polygons"

    I called those vertex, "lonely" vertex xD (vértices solitarios/separados) in spanish xdd

  • Create New...