mapkoc

Check https://trac.wildfiregames.com/wiki/HotKeys for rotating and attack move

Sorry for hijacking your thread. I've always been interested in how were lobby ratings implemented and from your discussion I finally found how. I tested both functions and mine definitely is wrong, ratings jump too much with each result. scythe's mine Either I made a mistake or RD is really important. Test code: from random import choice, seed r1start = 2101 r2start = 1200 r1 = r1start r2 = r2start seed() for x in range(100): res = choice([-1, 1]) r1gain = get_rating_adjustment(r1, r2, 200+x, 20+x, res) r2gain = get_rating_adjustment(r2, r1, 20+x, 200+x, -res) r1 += r1gain r2 += r2gain print(str(r1) + " " + str(r2))

Hola, here's a function to update ratings based on the Glicko system and using scythe's same signature. Since inactive time and rating deviation are not stored, I used the games played to compute the deviation. http://www.glicko.net/glicko/glicko.pdf http://www.glicko.net/glicko/glicko2.pdf import math # Rating deviation extrema RDmax = 350 RDmin = 30 # Linear mapping GPthr = 160.0 # games played threshold m = GPthr / (RDmin - RDmax) # slope # Simple Glicko without rating deviation aging def get_rating_adjustment(rating, opponent_rating, games_played, opponent_games_played, result): r = rating rj = opponent_rating sj = (result + 1) / 2 # outcome # Linear mapping of games played to rating deviation # instead of RD = min(math.sqrt(RD_{old}^2 + c^2), 350) RD = RDmin if games_played > GPthr else m * games_played + RDmax RDj = RDmin if opponent_games_played > GPthr else m * opponent_games_played + RDmax # Rating delta q = math.log(10) / 400 gj = 1 / math.sqrt(1 + 3 * math.pow(q * RDj / math.pi, 2)) Ej = 1 / (1 + math.pow(10, gj * (rj - r) / 400)) d2 = 1 / (math.pow(q * gj, 2) * Ej * (1 - Ej)) value = 1 / RD / RD + 1 / d2 # RDnew = math.sqrt(1 / value) # not used for now return round(q * gj * (sj - Ej) / value)

a22 in official repos? If not just uninstall, remove ppa and reinstall.

Maybe a Mac user can help us with this. https://trac.wildfiregames.com/wiki/HotKeys doesn't suggest any difference for Mac. I also couldn't get some hotkeys to work like \ (BackSlash): Select idle unit. O + Left Drag: Over units on map: Only select wounded units. Alt + Shift + W: Toggle wireframe mode Any idea why?

Title inspired by rule 7 of terms of use: 7. Not attempt to artificially adjust any user of the service's rating or any of the statistics which impact it. (Examples of this are, but are not limited to: cheating in ranked games, reverse engineering the service, and taking advantage of other users of the service.) 8. Allow yourself to be removed from the service if at any time a moderator determines your behavior is not consistent with these rules. Some top players (camelius, Phyzic, Boudica, chrstgtr and MorTak that I know of) started resigning immediately rated 1v1s amongst themselves, gaining and losing more than 100 points. How does the community feel about this?

He did it again, vs felipe_chile. We can ban him but we can't prevent him from creating a new account (but we can track him now)

ip looks like 192.168.x.x Does it work with host in lobby and also with MP/Host game?

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/STUN Es lo que agregaron esta alfa para poder hostear partidas sin necesidad de abrir puertos. Casilla marcado por defecto en la ventanita de hostear.

I tried to talk to matgress. He denied this and then started speaking exclusively in portuguese. He's quite strong for 1300+. Can you post the replay as proof?

Por lo general el que tiene problemas conectándose a hosts que usan stun, puede ser el host, con stun sin abrir puertos, y los demás sí pueden conectarse a él.

TheN00b might be trolling with someone's legit nick, TheNoob 16..

For me, DavyJones deserves ban, but his rating is bad so he'll continue to do this.

Sólo el host tendría que abrir el puerto, los demás no. Esto pasa porque el host usa STUN (por defecto) y el router suyo tiene problemas para conectarse a STUN, tiene NAT simétrico o algo así.

Maybe proof can be uploaded here, ie replay. I will talk to MatGress if/when I see him.

I banned someone impersonating Grugnas as GruNGas

A bit off topic, when I hover over a selected map a description for a different map appears in the bottom

possible bug tow.zip

Something went wrong in the generaton of this wild lake, there are more than 200 elephants toomanyeles.zip

Check Delenda East. Maidens switch back and forth from archer to sword by paying a small fee with button

I think this comparison helps tuning accuracy, pierce, etc. for future versions. Right now skirm cav is too op. Feldfeld thinks this doesnt take into account moving targets and that archers are better than the graphs show.

Elexis asked me for replays of Danubius, Extinct volcano and Survival of the fittest. Danubius: mapkoc vs cenghizkhan (unrated) The small map is uncomfortable because the gaia cc is very close. I was trying to block the cc with houses to defend from rams. I think it should be played with low pop to make it harder, 150 was too much. Civs with swordmen have an advantage to kill rams, else go to p2 fast. Covering the whole shore with docks might stop gaia from unloading. danub.zip Extinct volcano: bbleft, soyunmatao, phoenixdesk, temple, Barxten (ffa) At minute 20 something water level rises, the biggest armada will win (garrisoned with 10 soldiers). volc.zip Survival of the fittest: bbleft, mapkoc, DsharkS4 The dynamic changed from a21. Having skirms is important to kill eles but you need fewer. Skirm cav prefered. Having swords (or eles) to kill rams became way more important. Hero can't garrison temple, make priest(s). Capturing bolts good, catas meh. This map should be played in 2x, show clock F12, >= large map for more treasures, revealed map optional, low pop not so important now, regicide optional. The first waves are WAY too easy, which is not so good. surv.zip

I'm using svn and rc on linux and I don't have this problem. I have only 7 a22 replays, each in its own dir and a replayCache.json.

Last few days there has been a proliferation of smurf accounts by some unknown good player(s). Its just anoying when they break team balance. Going back to the topic, I caught someone (I guess the same guy) using my name (joined by IP) Franksy also told me he played 1v1 with someone claiming to be me. Also, I think someone faked elexis3 account with rating in a maxtihost (but I can't prove that). I think the worst problem with this behaviour is that these idiots are making the victim look bad.