Stan`

If its missing changes then it's bad. It needs to be updated. In a perfect world commit(er)s would update it. Basically any relevant changes to either players or modders should be there. (Also anyone following commits can update it)

It's been there since at least 13 alphas ^^ (Alpha 13) https://trac.wildfiregames.com/ticket/1318 A few years later it was added as part of the tooltip https://code.wildfiregames.com/D1803

Oh really ? That's sad :/

It's inverted roughness (more or less). You can also try to combine the metallic but it won't have much added value. Spec map can have some color but not sure how long it will be supported (currently is)

Don't think we support inline links. Most of the time we use buttons for that. And you have to warn people they are leaving the game. Also internationalization might be troublesome.

Also do note that replays are bound to a specific version of 0 A.D. so if your replay was for Alpha XXIII you can only replay it reliably on Alpha XXIII. Else the outcome of the match will be at best really different. At worst the map or the units will no longer exist so you will experience issues.

if that's the only game you wanna play you might consider linux as chances are it will run better there.

You're welcome. Maybe the CI should print checkref's result in the comments or something so if it's broken in a revision you'd see it

@wowgetoffyourcellphone NFO - Checking public's integrity. INFO - The following mods will be loaded: public|mod. INFO - Loading maps XML... INFO - Loading maps PMP... INFO - Loading entities... INFO - Loading actors... INFO - Loading variants... INFO - Loading art files... INFO - Loading materials... INFO - Loading particles... INFO - Loading sound groups... INFO - Loading audio files... INFO - Loading GUI XML... INFO - Loading GUI data... INFO - Loading civs... INFO - Loading random maps... INFO - Loading techs... INFO - Loading terrains... INFO - Loading auras... INFO - Loading tips... INFO - Looking for missing files... WARNING - Missing file 'art/textures/ui/session/portraits/units/maur/ship_bireme.png' referenced by: public/simulation/templates/units/maur/ship_scout.xml WARNING - Missing file 'art/textures/ui/session/portraits/units/maur/ship_trireme.png' referenced by: public/simulation/templates/units/maur/ship_arrow.xml WARNING - Missing file 'art/textures/ui/session/portraits/units/rome/ship_quinquereme.png' referenced by: public/simulation/templates/units/ptol/champion_juggernaut.xml WARNING - Missing file 'simulation/templates/units/noldor_ship_scout.xml' referenced by: public/maps/scenarios/shipattacks.xml INFO - Validating actors... INFO - Validating variants... INFO - Validating gui files... INFO - Validating maps... INFO - Validating materials... INFO - Validating particles... ERROR - /zpool0/trunk/binaries/data/mods/public/art/particles/light_ray.xml: Invalid sequence in interleave, line 10 ERROR - 1 particle validation errors INFO - Validating simulation... INFO - Validating soundgroups... INFO - Validating terrains... INFO - Validating textures... INFO - Collecting materials... INFO - Collecting actors...

Looks like some files are still referencing template_unit_ship_warship_medium https://jenkins.wildfiregames.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/docker-svn/detail/docker-svn/4567/pipeline

Currently hardcoded in one js file called ambient.js or something. Maybe it could read the biome data or something.

Yeah usually those are non trivial bugs. Also I assume you tested on Linux Mileage may vary. Still distros will other than arch and stuff will never write our migration patches between SM versions

Maybe the minor check could be omitted, @Itms or @wraitii would know, but the major check has to stay. I don't know if it got better, but our SM versions are usually heavily patched and that could lead to trouble maybe? The distro would just say the package is broken and give up on it ? From my experience talking to maintainers SM is always the biggest pain, sometimes NVTT (no longer an issue now) and finally Fcollada when compilers decide to change things ^^ In the current situation given the missing parts I'd say we're not ready for 102.

It's the delenda est subforum, so nudity is their concern

Remesh will give you millions of polygons So probably not the right approach unless i misunderstood your goal. Usually you remesh then decimate 3000 tris isn't that bad considering it won't be displayed often, but given the above screenshots I'm feeling like there might be some places where you don't need the details. I suppose the clothing wrinkles could be part of the normal map, and using an aomap the details could be put in the diffuse (for the people playing with material quality 1.0) Another solution for the body is to steal the one from the units this way you keep the same level of details. Marking edge sharp should only add more vertices, not more triangles. I would say use whatever gives you the control you need without having to spend an eternity marking things sharp

Why do you need to remesh it and not just decimate it ? Although Ideally it should be done by retopology.

Spidermonkey also breaks API in minor versions sometimes (happened for 78). Another issue was the ICU problem where you need to have the same version between spidermonkey and 0ad else it will fail to link, but they do not pick it from the same place.

Not yet until Atlas is integrated in the main game. But @trompetin17 hasn't made much progress

I'm not sure deserve is the right term here. But point taken. Define Vanilla ? How do you review it? What prevents you from dumping 5 mods in the public mod? Cause to me it's assuming people play fair and that' apparently not the case So far all the discussions ended in disagreement with regards to what is cheating But I suppose that's normal considering everyone has their opinion Reputation points are generally nice, however If my understanding of the current lobby is not too outdated the problem is that there is a small group that always play with each other and never with new players and due to the sheer lack of players that just makes them quit the game

Since it's a pointer (Ptr suffix) maybe you just need to dereference it ?

I suppose they fall in the "derivative works" category so they would be CC BY SA 3.0 as long as you give credit to wildfiregames it should be fine

That is where the ignoreincompatibility check comes in play (i wonder if a small countermeasure would be to make that flag work only with signed mods). It's written in the signing mod rules that any mod touchig simulation cannot be signed with ignore compatibility checks to true. The rule is not perfect but it's the rule. The idea is just to say well you might run into sync troubles but also this mod changes thing in a way you might not want to play without it.

@hyperion Sure. IMHO mod.io's goal should be to ensure general mod safety. Not to ensure anything else. Commercial games have little ways of preventing cheating opensource ones even less so.

Even that badge wouldn't be enough. Some people just edit the public mod these days...

Usually happens when animation synchronisation mess up, sometimes when buildings have horse props.