borg-

Playing other game?

@Feldfeldback to play

Wp

There seems to be a rivalry between me and @ValihrAnt in the chat. This rivalry doesn't exist between the two of us, we just play to have fun, they are unrated games, to relax. Certainly in rated games the level would be better. I'm usually a troll in unrated games, I go all in almost every game, well I'm sure he can also play much better than that.

It can be frustrating to have the rally point and target simultaneously

They're probably not 100% ready. Some art, audio, music, etc... may be missing. I don't know what time period dalenda est covers, It could be something related to this too, not all civilizations are in the period of 0 a.d. Anyway, we are already working on the idea of adding new civilizations, probably for a28.

Hakunamata a little bold I would say, but brave.

These changes are not part of the proposal and style that 0a.d seeks.

@Stan` I want to express my sincere gratitude for all the support and encouragement you have given to the project and to each of us here. I'm sure you'll be successful in whatever direction you decide to take from now on. I hope to continue seeing your presence here on the forum.

Balancing is not under discussion here, but since you mentioned, the shield is just visual, it has no armor or increased health. Women gain a little more movement speed, vision range and a good attack, in compensation they decrease their ability to collect grain.

That's exactly what the technology does, just with some visual appeals, like shield and sword. If you change the name to loom 2, then we don't have any more problems

Taking advantage of your historical knowledge, I have been working on a patch so that Britis can build towers in neutral territory, the objective here is to bring some gameplay different from other civilizations. The name of the bonus is "great towers". I don't know if this is historically correct, could you help me here please?

Thank you for expressing your concern about this and taking some of your time to share your historical knowledge with us. Well, I believe you misunderstood what I wanted to express. I didn't give you the responsibility to prove it, if it seemed like that, I'm sorry. Before making the patch, I read some Celtic characteristics and women warriors were there, of course, it's not scientific at all. I always try to respect the premises of 0 a.d, and perhaps the main one is the historical factor, so if this really cannot be proven, so I think it should be removed. Well, I'm not a historian, so I won't have enough arguments to debate this, and I don't really want to. I don't mind that much, I just thought it could be an interesting feature for the gameplay. I think the name "warrior women" might sound bad, so if we choose not to remove that, I think the name could be changed.

Do we still have the kennel model/actor? I couldn't find it to make the patch.

Fake Natty.